• DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wow, somehow this escaped me all these years. I feel like I’ve got a bunch of fresh XKCD to read now.

      For the uneducated: On a mobile browser you just press and hold the comic (long tap). On a computer you hover over the image and the alt text will appear next to the cursor.

      The alt text in this one was:

      spoiler

      Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we’ve all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

  • candyman337@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the reason I was super hyped by the synergy of the fediverse, all the support and use of activity pub. And god I hope Facebook doesn’t ruin it. This community has grown so rapidly and organically, I just wanna see it continue to thrive.

    • crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s bad when the actual naming scheme is more ridiculous. See USB 3.2 gen 2x1. Hopefully usb 4 simplifies things, but let’s be honest, it probably won’t…

    • Vithar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t that almost always require a significant government intervention/regulation.

      • volodymyr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Phone and laptop chargers converged from numerous standards to just a few all on their own I think, no?

        • fristislurper@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, but under treath of lawmakers mandating a single standard. And the EU has now forced a single standard anyway on smartphones, tablets, etc.

          Although I agree that there are quite a few examples of a “naturally emerging” single standards without lawmaker intervention, but this is not really one of them…

          • volodymyr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I thought this is an example where standards in part converged naturally. But I agree that regulation was fundamental part of this process.

              • Mr. Beedell, Roke JL@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Indeed, the law applied to all manufacturers, but no other manufacturer wanted to remain with microUSB Type-B 2.0 due to economies of scale, etc. The loophole that Apple used was available to everyone anyway, so it’s not like they couldn’t have followed suit.

  • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, thats the positive thing.

    I don’t want a single application that just works for a few cases but doesn’t work for tons of other cases. With such a world we would have a Windows OS where you need to use Face-ID for everything you want to use and sometimes just crashes and restricts the usage of something simple stupid because you don’t have the magical Windows Battlepass or smth.

  • Korne127@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, in such a situation you should always try to compare the standards, look at the userbases and suddenly there are only very few that actually make sense. If everyone just does this, one standard will eventually crystalise as the one to use (or at least depending on the situation). Character encoding is an interesting example, because nowadays (almost) everything just uses UTF-8, despite there having been many.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      UTF-8 is absolutely magical in how it’s backwards compatible with ASCII. Windows still uses UTF-16 which makes supporting Unicode filenames and stuff a huge pain compared to linux. At least pretty much the entire web is UTF-8.

    • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In how many ways can you package a python?

      Just tie a knot with it and throw it in a bucket.

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I feel like this is almost where Apple is ahead of the game. Despite the EU hating it, they’ve been using the same lightning cable design for a long old time because it works well enough, it doesn’t suffer USB-A’s put it in 3 times to figure out which direction is right, and people have a billion of them laying around at this point.

    EDIT: Too many people to respond to individually but I do realize from a technical perspective it’s an inferior cable. Just saying the user experience was better for a long time before USB-C arrived and the fact they never changed it makes it easy to find a cable to use if you forgot yours etc. Yes it’s slow but I am not transferring stuff off and my iPhone regularly, no I’ve never had one die from the pins burning out (although I do know people that’s happened to).

    As for USB-C, I agree it’s better on paper and was excited when I got a laptop with USB-C but my personal experience trying to buy a PD cable that would actually deliver the rated 100w it was supposed to was abysmal. Went through multiple cables from Amazon that didn’t work for some reason, including Anker, and finally gave up and bought a cable from Apple that did work. But the fact some of them don’t do what they say they will and the fact you can end up with multiple black cables that all do different things but are completely unmarked as to what they do has made me very irritated with USB-C at this point, even while I do enjoy the higher speeds and power they can deliver once you figure out which cable is which.

      • DonJefe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        USB C is the way to go. It works with most devices from most manufacturers. The only people left out are Apple users and cheap devices still using USB mini/micro

            • scurzon@rammy.site
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              No it’s because they promised to support lightning for 15 years, that’s the level of trust partners can put into apple which can’t be done for any other oem, especially shitty lagdroids

              • camr_on@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                especially shitty lagdroids

                Thanks for transporting me back to 2013 for a second. I didn’t realize anyone was still doing the iPhone vs Android flamewar nonsense lmao

        • giant_smeeg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love USBC. I have a 100w charger next to my bed. Normally charges my phone. However I don’t need to fumble for different adapters for my personal and work laptop, I can just charge everything everywhere.

        • disasterpiece@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          USB-C has its own issues with standardization though. Good luck telling if a random USB-C cable supports fast charging (or what level of fast charging). Some don’t even support data transfer, others are lightning quick.

          Don’t get me wrong, I love USB-C and have a ton of high quality cables around my apartment despite being an iPhone user. But it still suffers from the same issue described in this comic. The one thing it solves is unifying the port, everything else is still chaos.

          https://www.androidauthority.com/state-of-usb-c-870996/

          • Undearius@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That comes to the issue of USB as a protocol. That information should be branded on the connector at each end.

            I do miss the days too when the connectors were colour-coded.

          • Mr. Beedell, Roke JL@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just only buy the best 240W USB4 USB-C cables. They have the correct markings on them – “40Gbps” and “240W”. No issues identifying them.

    • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except it’s a proprietary piece of junk stuck on USB 3.1 (and I love my thunderbolt connectors too much to let it slide), that can’t offer proper power delivery because of power pin literally burning out.

      The only thing they did good is fixing the need to check cable orientation before inserting it (yes, you don’t have to try three times, you can just actually use your eyes, USB-A connector’s orientations can easily be told apart just by two square thingies on each of it’s sides).

      But as USB-C came out two years later, it wiped the floor with lightning. Anyone saying otherwise is either insane, didn’t read the specs or purposefully misleading you. And only now Apple is switching over. Freaking 7 years later. Though, not because they realize how inferior their connector is, but because they were made to.

      • Belazor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaking as an Apple user - I am heavily invested in their ecosystem - I am extremely happy that Lightning is on death’s door. I fully agree with the EU and I am very grateful to them for forcing Apple’s hand.

        That being said, your point about USB-A falls apart when you consider any situation where your vision is even partially obstructed. Such as; back of the computer, back of your monitors, a dock unless you’re holding it, etc etc.

        What I’m hoping will happen:

        1. Apple sells only USB-C to USB-C cables
        2. Apple users start requesting more USB-C ports on motherboards / desktop computers
        3. Mouse/Keyboard manufacturers produce USB-C alternatives of their products
        4. Motherboards move even more to USB-C
        5. GOTO 3 until USB-A becomes as legacy as VGA or PS/2
        6. We hopefully never see another single orientation external cable ever again.

        A lad can dream…

        • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t need to check female port orientation, it’s always the same, pins inside the port are looking at the board the connector is soldered to. Of course, unless manufacturer decided to do something funny, but no standard is protected from that.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also a closed system that no one else is allowed to use. Apple is far from everyone.