• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 hours ago

    But srsly to me it does feel like the future, because when I was a kid “by the year 2000” was synonymous with a glorious future of space hotels, undersea cities, moon bases… I can’t believe we’re a quarter of the way through the 21st Century and none of that has happened. On the plus side we did get really spiffy new ways to buy stuff we don’t need with money we don’t have, and fingertip access to pretty much all of human knowledge, which most of us ignore in our endless quest for entertainment. But oh well.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, because you were thinking of all the ways technology could have been awesome, while what they were working on was making it funnel all the world’s wealth to a handful of people.

    • FalcoLombardi1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Fucked up thing is some of that has happened, but you need to have been born into generational wealth to be a part of those things. Ritchie Ricn is just moralisticly better version of Musk. Or at least a version less hooked on coach K

    • Leomas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think your priorities are in the wrong place if you think about “forums for communists” instead of “telegram channels with incel nazis”.

      • vanillama@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I interpreted it as them mentioning lemmy (since lots of lemmy users are communists or socialists of some flavor), but if they meant to complain I agree with you completely

          • Leomas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Now I feel compelled to ask: Do you this meme is seriously asking for opinions on subversive innovations? Because I interpreted it as asking what is the most dystopian.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I took it as the poll itself, and the results, being entirely irrelevant. They just decided to use that as the format/delivery mechanism for their joke.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              It appears to me that the meme is complaining about tech breaking laws, not soliciting opinions. In case this needs to be said, I’m using Lemmy because of its ability to resist (legal!) censorship, especially of long-overdue leftist speech.

            • Leomas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              And I hope you would agree nazis killing people are more dystopian than fucking larpers.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      But then the poll would make little sense, because forums for communists would win with 99.97% of votes…

  • GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fake money for criminals helped me buy weed when I didn’t have a local dealer. It’s also how I pay for Mullvad. So fake money for criminals wins.

          • TotallyWorthLife (She/Her)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Also depends on your definition of privacy. Some people confuse privacy (not seeing what you do) with anonimity (not knowing who you are).

            Public blockchains (like BTC) have zero privacy, as everyone sees the transactions and balances, meanwhile private ones (like XMR) supposedly avoid anyone but two people in a transaction to know that transaction happened, or even to know each other’s balance.

            In both cases, I would say you are as anonymous as your way to turn the coin from/into fiat is (P2P, KYC or non-KYC platforms, etc.).

            Like with AI, I like crypto as a concept, but the practice… (specially the resources both consume for what little benefit they end up having)

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              You can swap Monero with a more common coin on a decentralized exchange with no KYC, and then cash that out at your Coinbase or whatever.

              Also, Monero is very efficient for a proof of work coin, partially because it’s designed to be mined on regular, consumer grade PCs.

              According to Google, it uses somewhere between 645 and 650 GWh annually, compared to between 150 and 204.4 Terawatt-hours (TWh) for Bitcoin.

              Bitcoin was the first, and as is usually the case, that makes it one of the worst.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago
    • Doorbell surveillance network
    • Self-service identity theft
    • State secrets betting house
    • Billionaire fan club fund
  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    The exposure of hotels using surveillance pricing. A room should cost a hunnert bucks a night. Not $100 or $150 or $200 or $250 etc., depending on which “app” you pray to. Am I right Trivago?

  • Dack@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is everyone so toxic? If you wanna discuss something be nice. (Even if you think that the person you are discussing with is a complete idiot)

  • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    i’m going with the fake money for criminals, cuz sometimes the criminal in question is a trans person trying to get their medicine

    to my great annoyance, almost all diy hrt online can only be bought using crypto. and wow does it make you hate cryptobros to have to navigate an ecosystem clearly designed for speculation to get your life-saving medicine 🫠

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        the homebrewer i was buying from didn’t support this one, so i would’ve had to convert it, which means fees typically

        anyways, i don’t really care to maintain a crypto portfolio. i buy the coin when i buy the thing, so volatility isn’t too much of a concern. my main annoyance is at the bonkers fees that exchanges want because they (rightly) recognize cryptobros as a milkable consumer base

        • musicalphysics@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Creating a market to exchange crypto and cash enables everyone’s use. Speculative markets are a natural feature of something new like bitcoin and would’ve happened regardless.

  • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fake Money for Criminals.

    Turns out things for criminals sometimes can be an okay thing for noncriminals.