• KinNectar@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Red pill all the way. Personal experience gains to be had. Also of course there is the prospect of crypto billionairedom.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Red pill effectively kills your current spouse and kids if you have any. Also trying to re-engineer the relationship with your original spouse all over again seems like it’d be really creepy. If you go back, you effectively need to find someone else. Couldn’t do that.

          • greenskye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but you’re throwing away your current spouse and kid in favor of a do over. That’s pretty cold.

            • psud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Is it unethical to leave a partner? Should we censure Paul Simon for 50 ways to leave your lover?

              (Not addressing the kid bit, since it does seem a tad cold to unexistify someone for little fault of their own, also no one but you mentioned kids)

              • greenskye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean if you were going to divorce your partner, then by all means take the red pill. You’d probably both be better off then. I was speaking of presumably happy marriages.

                • psud@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I guess if you’re in the perfect partnership you and your partner could simultaneously take the red pill :)

        • KinNectar@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying I won’t be buying real estate in San Francisco, Magic The Gathering cards, and shares in big tech, but a solid backbone of 1000x value bitcoin is hard to beat on multiples.

        • KinNectar@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Actually bitcoin on a physical harddrive purchased at $50 or below stored in a safety deposit box is pretty ironclad.

            • explodicle@local106.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That was a lot more difficult before BIP39 seed phrases were invented. You could of course write down anything, but there would’ve been a lot of room for error.

            • psud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Spinning hard drives last for decades. You can pretty absolutely protect yourself by storing two with multiple copies of the key each

              • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They are succeptible to magnetic degradation, its why you go to open a jpeg from 8 years ago and some are suddenly corrupt. You have to leave them in a RAID setup with sonething self healing like ZFS. They are way more reliable than cold storage SSD ( which can start bitrot in as little as a month) but for cold storage magnetic tape is better

                • psud@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Tape is just as susceptible to magnets, though it is a more stable medium. It’s not like they’ll be exposed to significant magnetic fields though

                  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Its not just significant magnetic field ( apparently we do have geo magnetic storms that corrupt data) it is that assigning the 1 /0 bit is not permanent. The 1 or 0 you store fades with time as it wants to lose its assigned magnetism. You might be fine for 10 years, or you might lose a critical bit corrupting a file. it is why archival experts suggest if it is critical data stored offline you need to store on two or more different mediums, because “1 copy is not a backup”. Anyway, we are getting deep in the weeds of data entropy and recovery and I think your original comment was meant as being helpful to the lay-person…whom may not actually care to much if they lose a file or two, unless it is a crypto wallet key–i would trust those M series BluRay archival format since the laser alters the disk, but printing out on paper as another copy

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Many of us are tech nerds. We know that those who lost bitcoin to hacks trusted coin exchanges too much.

          The people who kept their wallet offline are fine Those who kept their wallet in the cloud are poor

        • explodicle@local106.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since we get all the information we have now: the correct answer was Bitcoin Armory. You’d have a dedicated computer just for signing transactions, carried back and forth over flash drives.