• mihies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      With all the surveillance in that area, it will be pretty much soon (publicly) clear whether it’s true or not.

      • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        we already have a picture of the IL-20 that was claimed to be “shot down” yet it landed safely

        how much longer until we get a picture of the A-50 and westerners memoryhole another pathetic propaganda attempt?

        • Ashy@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Reading the article helps. It says the IL-22 was damaged and " tried to reach the nearest airfield, but it disappeared from the radar after the descent began".

          So you basically just provided the evidence that confirms half the story. Thanks mate!

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everything I read about the il20 said it was hit but flew away, descending in control, so no surprise with your photo