As for the (Microsoft) statements that “we’re still the same id”, Hays says that "First of all, we’re not the same id. We’re half the same id. It was the people—what made us special was the people and the relationships that we have. It’s not the IP

Hasn’t Microsoft been “restructuring” and firing people from a lot of game studios recently?
IDK, maybe the plan is to issue a bunch of AI tokens to them, and have AI do the “art” instead?

But I’m sure it will be just the same. /s

If his staffers have given that impression, and Biden doesn’t correct it, it’s the same thing.

Exactly, they don’t want to improve things, they want to hold on to what power they have, even if it means being the opposition to Republicans really having the power.

You may be right, and it’s horrible if you are, but I don’t think so, if Biden had endorsed her she would probably have won, and the Democrats would have been in a way better position.

IDK if you are joking or not, but there are clearly often younger candidates, but the ones that get the funding from the DNC are ALWAYS the old candidates. Which was what David Hogg wanted to change.

Better claim to be a dis-content creator then.

You could also say that with a life expectancy around 78 in USA, it is wrong to have an average age among law makers of 66 years old.
The future should be decided by those that expect to live and work and have children in it. Not those that can retire tomorrow if they want.

That would make a lot of sense IMO.
I know there are people who are fit at a higher age than that, like Bernie Sanders.
But on average I think it’s detrimental to society to have an average age among law makers that is 66 years old (Senate). AVERAGE!
I’m not so far from that myself, and I’m fit as a fiddle. But I can still see how it is detrimental to progress to have politics dominated by people who are OLDER than me!
I have no idea what young people are doing nowadays, apart from being wrong on the internet of course? 😋
But I hope they value environment healthcare and a living wage more than those 66 year olds do.

Will it make a difference? IDK, but it doesn’t seem logical to have policies deciding the future to be set by people who are in the last part of their life. The future should be decided by those that actually have one, instead of those that could/should go on retirement tomorrow.

To put it in more practical terms. policies that decide the future should be decided by those who expect to live, work and have children in it.

Raspberry Pi specifically supports Linux, and has its own Linux distro, and that is awesome.
But they have their own boot process, so the Pi support for Linux cannot be transferred to other Arm devices. And despite the good support for Linux it took them years to get 3D supported on the graphics side.
Raspberry Pi is very much an exception from the rule. But there are some others like Pine 64.
But when you move to laptops or even Arm phones or Tablets the support is abysmal, unless it SPECIFICALLY suports Arm.
Arm PC’s do not have the same boot process as normal PC’s and laptops, and AFAIK that already is a problem. Arm PC’s are locked in harder.
On Raspberry Pi it’s allowed to install whatever you want, so you can easily install your preferred distro.

100% agree, and absolutely a travesty that David Hogg was thrown out as Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee for trying to push exactly that agenda.
Democrats aren’t learning, politicians are supposed to be ideological leaders, but in the democratic party they are more holding back.

Absolutely, the advantage of having a president that is not an insane psychopath should be pretty clear, dementia or not.
But unfortunately it wasn’t to about half the American population! 🤥

Sad to hear Biden is in pain, I wish him well.

But this just proves It was moronic by Biden to want to run for a second term. Almost as moronic as people voting for Trump.
Biden broke his promise to not run again, and by doing so he ruined the democratic process in the Democratic party, forcing Harris to become the candidate without a proper campaign.
And the democratic values in the Democratic party were already questioned by many.
If the Democratic party would pull themselves together and actually live up to their name, that would be wonderful.

It’s consistent with what I’ve read other places, there’s a reddit thread saying almost exactly the same.
Claiming it’s like asking your dog is a crazy strawman by you and pure idiocy. And you show nothing to expose any inaccuracy in the Goggle response. In short you are wasting my time and I will now block you because you are just annoying.

Why do you think that? Last I heard these Arm laptops have all sorts of problems, and they apparently also have boot lockers.

This is what Google has to say about it:

Running Linux on the Acer Aspire Go 15 (AG15-Q31P)—which features the ARM-based Qualcomm Snapdragon C processor—presents significant hurdles. Because Snapdragon ARM chips require specialized upstream kernel support, device trees, and signed drivers for components like the Adreno GPU and Wi-Fi, out-of-the-box mainline Linux compatibility for this specific entry-tier ARM platform is currently experimental and incomplete.

Edit:
To the Idiots downvoting because I show the AI result, but have nothing to offer on the issue themselves. 🤡 🤢

This thread on reddit says the same thing, although there are disagreements:
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/1nrva4o/are_qualcomm_snapdragon_supported_on_linux/

But clearly not solid info that would make me risk buying a device that may or may not work.
Pick your poison.

Edit PS:
I also don’t see why Fedora would run better than other distros? Maybe they have an excellent Arm team IDK?

Can it run Linux? Otherwise I don’t give a shit.
But unfortunately Arm ( and Qualcomm) suck at supporting Linux, especially on the graphics drivers.

USA has become an openly fascist nation, and Americans are accepting it, reluctantly maybe, but still overall the Americans are accepting being an openly fascist country now. Where the execution of the law is for the regime alone to decide, and if you oppose it, you become a target.

And people who are lollygagging or jaywalking which has already been the case for a long time now.
Actually just being near where they are is basis enough. And if you complain about it, it is reason enough to kill you.
Let’s just admit that there is nothing protecting anyone from ICE. It’s like claiming Germans had protections against Gestapo during WW2.

Religion is per definition belief without evidence. If there was evidence it would not be religion but a fact.
How do you determine beliefs without evidence are not superstition?

First per the article you linked, the religiousness among scientists typically vary from a third to half of the general population.
Clearly indicating that religiousness declines with higher education.

But apart from that:
So you are saying that because some scientists too are superstitious it proves superstitions are valid?

Let’s take a concrete example here, one of the most brilliant scientists of all time, that solved the problem of AC electro motors and generators when nobody else in the world could. Nikola Tesla was highly superstitious and would favor numbers 3-6-9, and avoid stepping on cracks in the pavement, and he hated pearls as he thought they had magical properties.

Am I more intelligent than Nikola Tesla was? No of course not. But that doesn’t mean his superstitions were rational.

If you look at larger scale on the countries that are the least religious in the world, you will see that several polls show the Scandinavian countries are among the absolute least religious. They are also among the highest educated, and they score very high on happiness and just about every measure about the quality of society.

On the other end, Africa is the most superstitious and religious continent and also the least educated. Where you can find stories about goats being judged in court, because they think it is a wizard that transformed himself (yes literally!).

Obviously there are also non religious scientists, and all research shows that on average religiousness drop with higher education.
By your post I’m guessing you are religious yourself. And I’d like to ask how and why you chose your particular religion over another religion?

That or TACO class will probably be a common nickname if they actually go ahead and call it Trump class.