I love how ‘people I disagree with’ becomes ‘people without principles’

While a lot of libertarians end up being conservatives that want to be cool, I’ve met quite a few who believe strongly in the fundamental principles.

I disagree with them precisely because they are principled. I don’t feel the need to deny them their capabilities of believing something.

Is this just you being unable to imagine people who legitimately disagree with you?

Anarchists are to liberalism as libertarians are to Republicans.

Every so often you’ll run into one that is serious and intellectually rigorous to the ideals they profess, but most of them are simply (liberals/republicans) but also want to be cool.

Yes, a website without SSL is very likely a phishing attack, it means someone might be impersonating the real website and so it shouldn’t be trusted. Even if by a fluke of chance you hit the right site, all of your communication with it is unencrypted, so anyone in the path can see it clearly.

No, Google has hit me with this multiple times for sub domains where the subdomain is the name of the product and has a login page.

So, for example, if I have emby running at emby.domain.com they’ll mark it as a phishing site. You have to add your domain to their web console and dispute the finding which is probably automated. I’ve had to do this at least three times now.

All my certs were valid.

Goddammit.

You literally just redefined the word ‘tankie’ when called out for your shitty definition of it.

Also George Washington was a leftist extremist to the British monarchy.

I don’t think it does.

This is the correct answer and should be the top post.

Christians don’t do it. Americans do it. And they did it for the same explicit reason as the others thanks to the psycho weirdo Kellogg of the cereal fame to try to prevent masturbation, and sexual pleasure.

Fuck off, Nazi.

You need to read more.

Why would you have sympathy for Israel attacking without provocation a state that turned out to be stronger than they thought?

What the actual fuck.

The staffers helped murder 5 million people.

Okay CIA.

You want failure and don’t want communism or socialism in other words.

You know what the single most powerful force in human history is?

Organization. Which is always hierarchal. It doesn’t have to mean socially, but definitely organizationally.

If anarchism didn’t exist, the CIA would have had to create it.

You know what the most common attribute of Anarchist revolutions is? They all failed. Every single one of them. That is what you want. Failure.

25 trucks a day is still starvation conditions for most people.

I started to down vote you, then I saw your username and was like “what?!”

Then I reread your first C.

Well done.

If you moved to the slave states before the civil war, you would absolutely be one of those assholes even if you didn’t enslave someone, or were in charge.

If you were a white South African during the apartheid years, and didn’t leave as soon as possible EDIT: or fight the apartheid state, you were one of those assholes.

If you were a white Rhodesian… Actually, for this one, you were just an asshole, no qualifications.

That is one of the more honest examples of what they do.

You want dishonest?

They count the difference between expected birthrate and actual birthrate.

War causes people to have less babies? Each baby not born = 1 death caused by communism.

Worse then dead, they never were.