Entirely taken over? By what metric? This is literally the only post on the topic in this community…
- 0 Posts
- 375 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 20th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
No, you’re literally not allowed to enjoy having a private space to yourself.
Why? It’s not a main thoroughfare or (trigger warning) stroad. You can just cross the street back and forth as much as you like without any safety risk. Why put down even more non-permeable material and decrease density and increase the city’s maintenance burden for no increase in utility or throughput?
How many housemates do you have? Why don’t you have more?
Of course. So providing profits to utility “owners” is money stolen from the people that could be more productively used literally anywhere else.
I guess the issue I have is less the report itself, but the way you are trying to wield it to prove that the concept of induced demand which is not what the report is talking about at all.
How does this article manage to say so many things about energy use in arctic tundras without even once recognizing that just maybe it takes more energy to heat a living space in an arctic tundra? Bafflingly stupid analysis.
All gay men are always casual sex. No exceptions.
Indubitably I say they do be, good chap
In what world is 1 in 5 not considered rare?
You will enjoy this 30s documentary.
Ok thats based af. It’s not about stopping one idiot, it’s about saving thousands of people from being subjected to discussion-derailing derailing drivel.
They aren’t complaining that there aren’t enough filters. They’re pointing out just how stupid and futile filtering a few words is in the first place.
It sure looks like you baited this squirrel with something to keep it still for your video…
A fire….at a SeaParks??
I prefer the teachings of the wise frenulum.