That’s efficient compared to the people I worked with. Next you’ll tell me they didn’t leave shit stains on the toilet seat.

The only people I do this stuff for is my parents, because they certainly did a lot for me over the decades. Also, if I don’t do these things for them, some asshole will drain their bank accounts because their passwords would be the names of their children.

What chain of logic brought you to that conclusion from what I’ve said? Step by step please.

It’s not a terrible metric if it’s used as it was initially intended. IQ was supposed to be a benchmark to show where you’re at, like weighing yourself on a scale. Then you’re supposed to take measures to improve it. It was never meant to be a defining attribute or a contest. Bragging about having a higher IQ than someone makes as much sense as bragging about how much skinnier you are than someone else. Bragging about having a 135 IQ makes as much sense as bragging about weighing 135 lbs.

They don’t have to win. They don’t even have to follow through on their threat. They’ve already done what they meant to do and that’s just to intimidate everyone else. There will be plenty of folks who see this and maybe speak out a little less or stop speaking out entirely. Do you think this case is going to get the same exposure after it’s been dropped? They’ll already be onto the next intimidation tactic.