https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/joke

Why do you care

If it works it works. You mathematicians just don’t understand the pragmatics. What is tech debt?

He knows that peacefully voting is the only way to bring down the fascist Trojans.

Not disappear entirely, but most households won’t own desktop computers or HDDs.

I can fix her

It’s saying the quiet part out loud. Surely anyone who sees this will be outraged?

The password you have chosen is already in use by a different user (bob@example.com). Please choose a different password.

If you prefer instant gratification and “good enough” over robust, verifiable information: be my guest. But it doesn’t make you superior. You are not unique, skilled or brave for using LLMs.

I think virtually everyone here has played with them. We’ve all seen better and worse outputs. You are not unique, you just care less about truth and accuracy.

So since we have to manually verify everything anyway, the LLM just becomes a mere search engine.

This contradicts the entire point you claimed it was useful in the first place because we would still have to visit those websites.

The first gamer pope 😎

I asked ChatGPT and it says he still needs his glasses while not in costume. So that settles this debate.

/s

Don’t worry, DOGE will just fire the investigators before that happens.

👺

Sure. For the fact that many jurisdictions outside of the US also consider freedom of speech and other human rights to apply between private parties: this is called “horizontal effect” and covered extensively in case law by e.g. the European Court of Human Rights. See also this chapter for an international comparison and this paper for a European perspective.

As for the specific rules in the EU for platforms: Article 17 of the Digital Services Act requires that users who are banned or shadowbanned from any platform are provided with specific information of what rule they broke, which they can then appeal internally or in court. Article 34 and 35 requires very large platforms (such as X) to take broad measures to protect i.a. the users’ freedom of speech.

More to the point, one person who was shadowbanned by X in a similar way used the DSA and won in court

(Edited to add the last paragraph)

*in the US.

The EU recognizes that human right such as freedom of speech also should be protected against private parties. Platforms can’t ban or restrict you for arbitrary reasons here.

I’m of the opinion that having a lot of money shouldn’t, in fact, allow you to do what you want. No person should have this power to do mass censorship, not in the last place because manipulating online discourse means manipulating a fundamental aspect of democracy.

Musk specifically is meddling in elections, both in the EU and the US by e.g. bribing voters. Turning the dials of the algorithm lets him do this even more effectively.

But the whole point of the doomsday machine is lost… if you keep it a secret! Why didn’t you tell the world, eh?

So what is the reason for doing it that way?

And you think that’s going to happen by removing the trashcans?