I distinctly remember that before I left Reddit, I had some lovely discourse with someone who was absolutely inconsolable over my opinion that Biden was too old for the job. Got called ageist and everything else they could think of.

Trust me, I hate being right.

I can have a Huawei steak as a little treat

I’m extremely positive that they’ll listen and admit wrongdoing as well. For sure.

I can’t imagine ever having such a cynical and apathetic worldview. All of this death is acceptable to you because more children will be born? Because they’ll be replaced?

Set a reminder on your calendar for March, and we’ll take a look at the news at that point. I have a sneaking suspicion that you may be surprised. While you’re at it set a reminder to get some therapy too, christ

Why are hospitals in Gaza under Israel’s crosshairs? Why? Is it truly that difficult to step back and think for a moment about why Israel would want to erase the current populace entirely?

Amazing, what a mystery

imagine downvoting this comment

You don’t have to pick sides people.

Ooh boy, another enlightened centrist. Makes vague states about everything and holds no strong positions on anything

ladies please, you’re all beautiful

emacs is solely for watching the text version of Star Wars and you know it

I have zero patience when trying to make small adjustments to files, which is what my command line text editor should be for. Nano just has everything at the bottom in case you forget (I do, frequently) so the workflow is ridiculously streamlined for me

I’ll level with you: I’m kind of a moron.

If my command line text editor has its own bespoke integrated command line, then science has gone too far and we need to stop lmao

nano crew where you at

honestly my dumb ass will choose for i in list: over for i := range slice { every single time. I’m ugly and I’m proud!

didn’t know the go compiler’s name was steeve

mfw my face when the go compiler fucking screams at me because I dared to declare a variable and not use it

Nice, made it extremely clear this time that you have no interest in actually discussing anything. Really appreciate your honesty, have a good one

Damn, still couldn’t make it past the first sentence huh? Really hard question too, I’m not surprised you conveniently ignored it given the aptitude you’ve shown so far. Ain’t my fault that you can’t possibly comprehend two things being somewhat similar yet remaining distinct.

God, I love sealioning.

Yes.

If you had made it past the first sentence you’d see how legit it is.

You’re oversimplifying in order to compare the two. Wildly different historical contexts with entirely unrelated events. Distilling both down to “area conquered” just so you can make a point is reductive.

Beyond that though, why does it matter honestly? Does the fact that a city was conquered in the 1400s invalidate anything mentioned so far?

False equivalence, that’s an entirely different historical context. Things can apply to one situation and not another