Username checks out

Sure LMAO

I don’t think you understand the concept of exponential, or radioactivity for that matter tbh. The statement is completely truthful.

The harm of ionizing radiation is given by the activity of the source. Which decays exponentially. You should not go on the internet lecturing people you don’t know about things you don’t understand.

Also, you moved the goalpost: first you claimed waste “doesn’t decay exponentially” and then without acknowledging it, you now claim that “exponential decay is not the same as losing harm exponentially”

Sorry what? That link literally explains the exponential decay of radioisotopes.

Rate of decay for a specific isotope is constant, so its abundance decays exponentially. Of course a species can transmute in a new radionuclide so the process in total will not be exactly exponential, but pretty close. Seen on a log scale it’s awfully close to a straight line

Funny how everyone is immediately concerned with a few thousands of cubic meters of solid waste that literally loses its harm exponentially quickly and we can store underground while all the billions of tons of toxic liquid and gaseous waste coming from a sleuth of industrial applications (including renewables production) constantly being pumped in the biosphere never get a mention

Well you know how that goes.

I don’t, please elaborate.

Land use and energy storage requirements beg to differ

Are the people making you deppthroat bugs in the room with us right now?