• Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Concluding paragraphs are a thinly veiled bash at Golang and its creators. Whatever. I like Go. I like C. I like lots of other languages, for different reasons. Haven’t learned Rust yet, but am already tired of the ivory-tower attitude of its proponents.

    • codemonk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I would not call it a bash. Go’s approach naturally comes up in discussions on async Rust. Thus, it makes sense to at least briefly mentioning the trade-offs that approach has.

    • themusicman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like Go too, but not because it’s a good language. I like it because it’s the simplest garbage language I have to use regularly, and that puts a cap on how bad it can be. It also got a lot of language-adjacent things right, like tooling.

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Heh, ‘garbage language’ or ‘garbage-collected language’? Until Go I considered the two to be the same :)

        But yeah… the tooling is a strong point IMO.

        (Package management went downhill once the whole GOPROXY thing was introduced. When ‘go get’ was the simplest way to fetch packages, things were great IMHO … but I’m not doing big enterprise-y stuff so maybe my view is too narrow as to the issues of ‘vendoring’, version management etc.)