• essell@beehaw.org
    82·
    9 months ago

    It’s not the same thing.

    Judging behaviour and actions is entirely different to judging people for who they are.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      46·
      9 months ago

      People are compiled of their actions and behaviors so I am not really getting what you are trying to say.

      • essell@beehaw.org
        1·
        9 months ago

        Some traits are inherent / congenital, historically these were used to judge and “cancel” people

        Still are at times

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          11·
          9 months ago

          I dont recall the religious right cancelling people due to their inherent characteristics. On the other hand, the left actively discriminates against people for the same thing.

          • essell@beehaw.org
            2·
            9 months ago

            Oh really? I wonder if a religions have ever used gender to define what roles a person can have and who gets a platform?

            I’m not sure if we’re just definitely terms differently or you’re lacking an understanding of history here.

            The religious right has always given a voice to a small number of people and cancelled everyone else

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              1·
              9 months ago

              So you are going to point to women cant be head pastors in some churches as indication that they cancel people due to inherent characteristics?