I posted any number of links to information on what actually happened at the beginning of this conversation, but you’re not going to engage with any of them, because you’re not actually interested in what actually happened; you’re interested in winning a debate on the internet. But the two or three people who are still reading this thread don’t seem to be impressed with your unserious line of argument.
Why would i engage on deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.
I posted any number of links to information on what actually happened at the beginning of this conversation, but you’re not going to engage with any of them, because you’re not actually interested in what actually happened; you’re interested in winning a debate on the internet. But the two or three people who are still reading this thread don’t seem to be impressed with your unserious line of argument.
Why would i engage on deflection? You’re not even trying to proof the finding wrong, merely justifying the reason, which is admitting human right violation indeed happened within China. And i have no desire to impress anyone from this instance.