#SearchEngine #FederatedSoftware #Fediverse --- Note, this blog is not cited, sorry! --- We cannot use google forever, no one can ind...

I’ve been trying to figure this out for over a year now.

This is my latest concept that I’ll try to make.

What do you all think?

  • sbv@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    3·
    6 days ago

    What if they don’t want that multi step process?

    Hard thing, but what are a few steps to avoiding AI spam results?

    There’s nothing inherent to this proposal that avoids spam or SEO. You describe it as a “moderation issue” and then mark it as out of scope.

    If avoiding AI spam or SEO sites is a feature of this proposal, then it should be addressed directly.

    • Clocks [They/Them]@lemmy.mlOP
      1·
      5 days ago

      What I mean by the avoid AI spam / SEO sites is Google, Bing, Yahoo etc all are filled with that.

      The concept behind the utilization of web-rings means that, assuming the web-ring is maintained by a trustworthy entity, the sites “attached” are reviewed as not AI / SEO slop.

      The responsibility to prevent AI / SEO is no longer in the hands of the developer, but in moderation and users verifying / certifying the quality of web-rings.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        3·
        4 days ago

        The responsibility to prevent AI / SEO is … in moderation and users verifying / certifying the quality of web-rings.

        The proposal should include mechanisms to support moderation and user feedback. That flavour of crowdsourcing is difficult because users, search engine maintainers, and web ring participants may be malicious.