• davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Reporter: [REDACTED]
    Reason: Breaks Community Rules

    Welcome to Lemmy, where the rules are made up and the votes don’t matter.

    • culprit@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “We have liberated Europe from fascism, but they will never forgive us for it.”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_genocide_theory

      Scholars have criticized the double genocide theory as a form of Holocaust trivialization.

      spoiler

      According to American ethnographer and Professor of Russian and East European Studies at the University of Pennsylvania Kristen Ghodsee, efforts to institutionalize the “double genocide thesis”, or the moral equivalence between the Nazi Holocaust (race murder) and the victims of communism (class murder), in particular the push at the beginning of the 2007–2008 financial crisis for commemoration of the latter in Europe, can be seen as the response by economic and political elites to fears of a leftist resurgence in the face of devastated economies and extreme social inequalities in both the Eastern and Western worlds as the result of the excesses of neoliberal capitalism. She says that any discussion of the achievements by Communist states, including literacy, education, women’s rights, and social security is usually silenced, and any discourse on the subject of communism is focused almost exclusively on Joseph Stalin’s crimes and the “double genocide thesis”, an intellectual paradigm summed up as such: “1) any move towards redistribution and away from a completely free market is seen as communist; 2) anything communist inevitably leads to class murder; and 3) class murder is the moral equivalent of the Holocaust.” By linking all leftist and socialist ideals to the excesses of Stalinism, Ghodsee posits that the elites hope to discredit and marginalize all political ideologies that could “threaten the primacy of private property and free markets”.