Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agoWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1290arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1277arrow-down1imageWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 hours agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareInverseParallax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down7·11 hours agoI have never understood how there was any competition. KDE has always been a better DE than anything on any platform, while gnome has been one of the worst and it just keeps going downhill.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 hours agoKDE gathered a lot of initial hate because the Qt widget library it relied on used to not be proper Free Software. (That was fixed about two decades ago, though.)
minus-squareargon@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down7·9 hours agoUnfortunately, GTK is much prettier than QT.
minus-squareInverseParallax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·8 hours agoI disagree completely, GTK looks like they took windows 3.11 and covered all the widgets in dried shit.
I have never understood how there was any competition.
KDE has always been a better DE than anything on any platform, while gnome has been one of the worst and it just keeps going downhill.
KDE gathered a lot of initial hate because the Qt widget library it relied on used to not be proper Free Software. (That was fixed about two decades ago, though.)
Unfortunately, GTK is much prettier than QT.
I disagree completely, GTK looks like they took windows 3.11 and covered all the widgets in dried shit.