• ttyybb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        For now. Let’s not pretend this doesn’t lay groundwork for goverment to require id verification.

          • ttyybb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sure, I dont have a problem with them following the law, all the blame falls squarely on the law makers. That being said I dont think it’s wrong to call out where I believe this is intended to lead. If you waste your time defending stupid regulations we’ll only be divided when it gets worse.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          were we not dealing with fascism i would not mind this, i’d think it was just part of a functional digital ID environment. that’s part of the problem. is it that i need to reconceptualize the digital ID or idk.

      • smeg@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        required = yes

        Easy to flag. Then Lennart Poettering’s startup van deploy the ID tech to comply with age verification laws.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          As long as I’m root in Linux there’s nothing that can be done about me doing whatever I want with that field. I’ll be born in 420-6-9, name “blaze” surname “it”.

          That’s the difference between windows and Linux. In Linux I’m truly root, the I do control everything in it, sometimes to my detriment, but definitely in my benefit in these occasions.

          Also, anything the Spanish government wants to protect, is as easy as forcing us to use a free to emit electronic certificate that personally identifies us, which is already used to enter public services webpages in a secure way.

          That age thing is actually way more useful that proper bullshit age verification, because parents, actual parents, can set a user account for their kids on the PC, and then that field would actually be valuable to limit access to tools. You know, instead of surrendering power to the government, which this tool doesn’t do, you would be giving power to parents to be proactive in protecting their kids.

          Isn’t that one of the most prominent talking points against mas surveillance based kid protection? Of which I completely agree, about giving tools and power to parents so they can better cater the exposure of their kids, without surrendering control, I mean.

        • gegil@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is it possible to fake age verification? For example adding a face scanner, which pretends to scan the face to estimate age, but actually just always returns true?

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is no verification outside of checking to see if it is a json date string creating than 1-1-1900

      You can set it to your birth date if you want but I don’t really see a use case