The expected etiquette upon posting in a forum thread dedicated to an article is that each poster has at the very least read the article. Your post could have been the elaboration of oc’s post that stated the far worse offense to the shock of casual readers as opposed to detracting from the actual discussion.
To answer your question in earnest, yes, because a double standard enforced as a means of countering an existing inequality that society refuses to correct is a better, albeit not best, solution than blanket condemnation. Another example would be that a gay male being touched in a bar by straight men would also be within his rights to respond with violence as statistically gay men are more likely to be victimized by straight men than the other way around. For supporting example, see article above.
The expected etiquette upon posting in a forum thread dedicated to an article is that each poster has at the very least read the article. Your post could have been the elaboration of oc’s post that stated the far worse offense to the shock of casual readers as opposed to detracting from the actual discussion.
To answer your question in earnest, yes, because a double standard enforced as a means of countering an existing inequality that society refuses to correct is a better, albeit not best, solution than blanket condemnation. Another example would be that a gay male being touched in a bar by straight men would also be within his rights to respond with violence as statistically gay men are more likely to be victimized by straight men than the other way around. For supporting example, see article above.