• SteveTech@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, both the Flathub website and KDE Discover list this, so this seems like a GNOME issue and not a Flatpak issue.

      Flathub:

      Screenshot of Evolution on Flathub

      KDE Discover:

      Screenshot of Evolution on KDE Discover

      • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        FlatHub website

        Where? I don’t see it here. Can click on the “manifest” but nobody will be reading all of that. Tried Tor Browser to rule out extensions. Maybe it’s actually communicating with the desktop client in some way which I don’t have?

        Also, a backdoor in this particular program can steal your PGP keys. Some clueless guy who added it to GitHub for a tutorial may have some issues if it’s not password protected. It’s in no way like Android where “OpenKeychain” were forced to define a protocol and now reading a key prompts the user.

        Oh, and one of the few dozen local privilege escalations found by AI in the mountains of trash of our great kernel completely negate all of this. It has to be AI because no human nowadays is doing all of that anymore. And enslaving humans to pick out code 24/7 isn’t legal anymore anywhere, ya know.

        • SteveTech@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Also, a backdoor in this particular program can steal your PGP keys.

          Now you can make that decision. Evolution is also available from the Debian and Arch (and others) repos without sandboxing, if you’d prefer it to have access your whole system.

          You can also remove those permissions with the Flatpak cli, or Flatseal.

          It’s in no way like Android where “OpenKeychain” were forced to define a protocol and now reading a key prompts the user.

          I don’t see why this couldn’t be done with Secret Service, just no one does so no one expects it. You should email one of the mailing lists for GnuPG if this bothers you though.

          Oh, and one of the few dozen local privilege escalations found by AI in the mountains of trash of our great kernel completely negate all of this.

          Well yeah, sandboxing/containers/namespaces were never guaranteed to be fully isolated, there’s a reason all the cloud companies settled on VMs over containers. It’s just one line of defence that you otherwise wouldn’t have.

          • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Again, you seem to be missing the point. Nobody would be “removing permissions with xyz tool”. People are told something is safe, therefore it must be safe. If it’s not then it’s not. And again with PGP, one example how a “simple user” could have PGP keys is if they use PGP email at work. Management != tech people, so container must equal safe in ooga booga brains. Keys get stolen because of supply chain (remember that library updates are separate and slower for flatpak). Container must equal safe, so everyone disregards what was written about XYZ program and the one to blame becomes the simple office worker*, another victim of capitalism*. Or the IT guy. My point is, marketing wrong.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          FlatHub website

          Where? I don’t see it here.

          click the red “medium risk” thing near the install button

          Oh, and one of the few dozen local privilege escalations found by AI in the mountains of trash of our great kernel completely negate all of this. It has to be AI because no human nowadays is doing all of that anymore. And enslaving humans to pick out code 24/7 isn’t legal anymore anywhere, ya know.

          that’s not a problem of flathub, but literally all computers. windows, macos, android is also susceptible to it.

          • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            click the red “medium risk”

            Literally how the fuck was I, or let alone “a simple user”, is supposed to know that? “Intuitive, uncluttered UI” my ass. Also “The software developer has verified their identity, which makes the app more likely to be safe” ??? How Android wannabe (without actually being anything like Android) do they want to be???

            not a problem of flathub

            The problem of flathub is the illusion of safety.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              click the red “medium risk”

              Literally how the fuck was I, or let alone “a simple user”, is supposed to know that?

              idk, this is the first time I saw that menu. it’s a pretty visible red at a prominent place on the webpage, so I wouldn’t say it’s hidden

              The problem of flathub is the illusion of safety.

              where is the illusion of the safety? where does it say it’s the safest thing ever made?