Unfortunately, only for their own benefit.
Unfortunately, only for their own benefit.
I guess if we had a sun god instead of Christianity, climate change wouldn’t be a thing.
It ain’t easy being grumpy
Probably not too many, but she seems to have landed a good job with this degree regardless.
Idk, but Disaster Girl has apparently made a good deal including a 10 percent cut on any future sales. Not that I think that this NFT has sold again for even near the original price but she will still get “royalties” from any additional sale for the looks of it. Good for her that she used this bubble in time.
I was wondering about that as well. We’ll probably never know. Anyway, I’m glad that her unwanted internet fame in this timeline hasn’t ruined her life and that she seems to have benefited from it instead - at least financially. That’s nice, because she really deserves to be compensated for the joy she brought to the internet over the years.
How time flies. Sorry to break it to you, but Disaster Girl is now 24 and apparently working as a Smart Cities & IoT Analyst at S&P Global. Somehow even Side-Eyeing Chloe is 13 by now…
M.C. Escher would appreciate this.
Yes, and while Charles Darrow, who became the first millionaire game inventor due to the game’s success, profited substantially from royalties, Lizzie Magie, the original creator of the game’s concept, sold her patent for just $500 and received no royalties.
ChatGPT and basically any other powerful LLM is very likely trained on lots and lots of pirated data.
What about OpenAI?
Maybe the downvote counter maxed out and that’s the way it is displayed.
There is no point in arguing about that
It’s the best argument, tremendous, irrefutable.
Pride Puppy. Apparently there’s even a children’s book about this doggo.
Trump is directly responsible for these excesses. In the press conference right after the conviction, he said:
This was a rigged trail by a conflicted judge who was corrupt. (…) This was done by the Biden administration in order to wound or hurt a political opponent.
These are, of course, allegations that have no basis in fact whatsoever. So I wonder: are there no legal means to prosecute Trump for these blatantly false allegations?
Shouldn’t the mere allegation that the judge was corrupt be enough to sue for defamation? I mean, it has to be enormously damaging to the judge’s reputation if someone makes such serious accusations against him.
Oh, it’s Spoofy.
Indeed. I’ll get to planning then. Maybe we can work together sometime.
It’s also kind of a Bruce Lee movie for goths - and I mean that in the most morbid sense, unfortunately.