Credit goes to Tsukikage-san (u/DigitalNightmare13) for the images

Himeka: original post

Ahko: original post

  • 6 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2024

help-circle






  • AI is a super broad field that encompasses so many tech. It is not limited to the whatever the tech CEOs are pushing.

    In this comment section alone, we see a couple examples of AI used in practical ways.

    On a more personal level, surely you’d have played video games before? If you had to face any monster / bot opponents / etc, those are all considered AI. Depending on the game, stages / maps / environments may be procedurally generated - using AI techniques!

    There are many more examples - e.g. pathfinding in map apps, translation apps -, just that we are all so familiar with them that we stopped thinking of them as AI.

    So there are plenty of evidence for AI’s usefulness.






  • Endmaker@ani.socialtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI love choice. I hate choosing.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Same thing with Fediverse instances.

    IMO the linux and/or fediverse community could learn a thing or two about UX from the establishment.

    I believe the best approach is to take note of the Pareto Principle: 20% of instances / distros would meet the need of 80% of users.

    I would simply recommend Ubuntu / lemmy.world to complete beginners (just based on market share). If they are interested in alternatives, they would naturally seek those out themselves.

    This concept is nothing new e.g. Google presents their searchbar front and centre; power users would click on “Advance Search” for their needs.









  • In the ‘Medium’ difficulty category, OpenAI’s o4-mini-high model scored the highest at 53.5%.

    This fits my observation of such models. o4-mini-high is able to help me with 80-90% of the problems at work. For the remaining problems, it would come up with a nonsensical solution and no matter how much I prompt it, it would tunnel-vision on that specific approach. It could never second guess itself and realise that its initial solution is completely off the mark, and try an entirely differently approach. That’s where I usually step in and do the work myself.

    It still saves me time with the trivial stuff though.

    I can’t say the same for the rest of the LLMs. They are simply no good at coding and just waste my time.