No, I never saw that movie. But if those kids did that to politicians, they’d probably just be arrested and imprisoned for mumble mumble cough.

I mean if not getting shot was so important to them, why aren’t they out there funding some campaigns?

Presumably one where Conor McGregor beats the shit out of a blind Peruvian nun or something.

I prefer my space vampires Mathilda May-shaped.

I always thought they were adorable. They did a great job making recognizable vehicles all dinky.

Dumb car but funny idea.

Glad to know I’m not the only old-ass person here who thinks the same thing.

Every time I saw one of those I wanted to put a penny in the back to make it do a wheelie.

#justoldpeoplethings

Oh hey get fucked, bigot

Yep I’d heard about that. Man those were some Wild West days.

Oh no, I’m talking the NES game. It was a hateful thing.

I mean major kudos for getting past the god dam level reliably. I think I beat it once on an emulator.

Don’t worry, no one beat that game.

(Obviously now sixteen people will come in and tell me they beat the game but I will take this chance to mention that the PC port was literally unbeatable without cheating or modifying the game due to a mapping bug.)

You read enough to get to the part where I pointed out “burden of proof” and ignored it completely. You’re a bad faith actor and an intellectually dishonest troll. I owe you nothing. It’s not on me to google shit, especially your insane and vague claim.

Nice non-defense.

Holy shit you’re bad at this. “Let me make a broad and extraordinary claim and it’s on you to prove it.”

Here’s why your rebuttal sucks and you’re bad at thinking:

1. You have never heard of “burden of proof”.
2. Biden wasn’t president when COVID was killing a million Americans, so your point is not just vague, it’s stupid.
3. You ignored all my other points completely.
4. Your only defense was completely unsourced whataboutism.
5. You think claiming “it’s not controversial” is like a cheat code for arguments.
6. Your fundamental “hellscape” argument relies on a definition of badness that is so impossibly narrow and dismissive that you’re basically claiming that Trump would only be a bad president if people were literally suffering and dying in the streets in such numbers that everyone had no excuse not to realize it, which utterly invalidates everything any human could do in a presidential term unless they literally went full Hitler.

Looking forward to your trenchant and scholarly “no u” rebuttal.

[citation needed]

Yeah, just a million preventable deaths, huge transfer of wealth to the upper classes, lots of children stolen from their families and caged, but my grocery bill wasn’t that high, so I don’t see the problem.

That trick ALWAYS works. A cat can give zero shits but once that toy is about to disappear behind something, it’s on like Donkey Kong.

Never would have thought “other people’s genitals” would have been it, but I seem to have vastly overestimated their critical thinking capacity.