A buddhist vegan goth with questionable humour.

  • 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 19th, 2023
  • Gloomy@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.world•Choices
    1·
    2 months ago

    Great question! The reason why I was using the 2017 report is that the Guardian arrival you originally referred to was from 2017, so I looked at the report they were working off of.

    That is sensible, yes.

    I regards to the graph you posted, it shows how emissions from private comps is have fallen and emissions from nations and nation owned companies have rissen. I think this is a relevant distinction to make, because the meme and the report as they are show a one sided picture (capitalism is the sole drive of climate change) whilst, looking at the complete data, a more nuanced picture emerges (like the role of nations in upholding the capitals system).

  • Gloomy@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.world•Choices
    3·
    2 months ago

    Looking at the numbers you should maybe include Chinas Coal Industry in there, since it is responsible for about 25 % of global emissions alone, according to the up to date report.

    And the people at Gazprom also deserve a prominent spot in that line.

  • Gloomy@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.world•Choices
    2·
    2 months ago

    Why are you using data from the 2017 report?

    You are referring to page 15, which shows emissions in 2015. In the up to date 2024 report this has been replaced with emissions after the Paris climate agreement, so 2016 till 2022.

    As you can see, the same picture emerges as I stated in my first post: the top actors are Nations or state owned producers. The contribution to global Co2 emissions is listet, but still only refers to fossil fuel and cement Co 2 emissions.

  • Gloomy@mander.xyztomemes@lemmy.world•Choices
    154·
    2 months ago

    This meme is not true and missleading. I know it fits the narrative of “companies bad”. But it’s not based on fact.

    It’s based on an article by the guardian.

    Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says

    The article is based on the Carbon Major Report.

    It describes itself like this:

    Carbon Majors is a database of historical production data from 122 of the world’s largest oil, gas, coal, and cement producers. This data is used to quantify the direct operational emissions and emissions from the combustion of marketed products that can be attributed to these entities.

    As you can see, they speak about “entities”, not companies. Who are said entities?

    75 Investor-owned Companies, 36 State-owned Companies, 11 Nation States, 82 Oil Producing Entities, 81 Gas Entities, 49 Coal Entities, 6 Cement Entities

    As one might realize, only 75 are Companies. Most of them are either States, or producers of Oil, Gas, Coal and Cement.

    The 71 % is not at all about global emissions. This is wrong.

    72% of Global Fossil Fuel & Cement CO2 Emissions

    So it’s 100 entities that are responsible for 72 % of the world’s fossil and cement Co2 emission.

    https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/05dfb9e1-ace2-4072-9fc5-7ed6f6eddfb2.png

    Looking at them you can see how the top emitter are very much not companies. Also, it’s historical Co2, a fact made prominent by the former Soviet union beeing the top emitter.

    Let’s look at some more findings:

    The Carbon Majors database finds that most state- and investor-owned companies have expanded their production operations since the Paris Agreement. 58 out of the 100 companies were linked to higher emissions in the seven years after the Paris Agreement than in the same period before. This increase is most pronounced in Asia, where 13 out of 15 (87%) assessed companies are connected to higher emissions in 2016–2022 than in 2009–2015, and in the Middle East, where this number is 7 out of 10 companies (70%). In Europe, 13 of 23 companies (57%), in South America, 3 of 5 (60%) companies, and in Australia, 3 out of 4 (75%) companies were linked to increased emissions, as were 3 of 6 (50%) African companies. North America is the only region where a minority of companies, 16 of 37 (43%), were linked to rising emissions.

    Here the report mixes state and private companies. The rise is most prominent in countries with state owned companies. Privote companies, as seen in Europe and North America, haven’t increased that much.

    So, all in all: The idea that 100 companies are responsible for the destruction of earth is plain wrong.

    I know the ideas that companies are responsible and to blaim for the current state of affairs fits our world view (it fits mine!!), but please don’t run into the trap of believing everything you read just because it does.

  • Gloomy@mander.xyztoWorld News@lemmy.ml•Germany Looks to Stop the Far Right From Assuming Power
    11·
    10 months ago

    I am not very well read in political theory, but I would agree with the idea that capitalism HAS to end in crisis because exponancial groth just can’t be sustained.

    I would further point out that, to my limited knowledge, capitalism is a (or even the) root cause of the current climate crisis (altough things like humans inability to solve long term problems, as well as other factors come into play too. After all, things like the ozon hole have been solved even under a capitalist system).