It’s ChatGPT that’s commenting this, isn’t it?

To be fair, it’s not that crazy - your agents are generating a lot of data that Azure DevOps is storing. And they’re doing a bunch of other things like release management and showing test results over time, etc etc

I’m using Azure DevOps practically free - (unless I build way too much and run out of free credits for the month)

But since so many things in Azure DevOps are already free… If you’re going to start substituting the paid features like extra build agents with your own “free self hosted agents” then where are they getting any money from?

Probably not “coolest” as in ‘best code ever’ or most complex code ever - but that got most coverage. So I think it’s pretty cool

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifJnWVSoyAY

Pretty cool. I tried to google it, and I couldn’t actually find the source for it. Just a bunch of articles about it and a reddit thread.

I’m curious what it’s written in

If it’s “open source hardware” wouldn’t it be pretty easy to put it different screens?

Like it also only had a 2 GB SD card… I’d guess most people would upgrade that

On September 19, Ruby Central, a nonprofit organization that manages RubyGems.org, a platform for sharing Ruby code and libraries, asserted control over several GitHub repositories for Ruby Gems as well as other critical Ruby open source projects that the rest of the Ruby development community relies on.

Uhm, so how does this happen? If some people create Ruby Gems and host them under their own github account, how would Ruby Central suddenly assert control over them?

You don’t get it. This was made in GameMaker Studio 1.4, which doesn’t support a modulo operator. You know nothing about this specific framework. I have 8 years of experience and hacked governments. There’s no reason to update it now, because it runs on a smart fridge at maximum capacity.

Documentation? Maintainable? Test cases? You’re too attached to old paradigms in a new vibe based world.

Why do you need any of those? If you need any new features, you just re-engineer your prompt and ask the AI to rebuild it from scratch…

Can someone explain how you accidentally rack up such a bill?

For example: You can deploy your Python script as a Lambda. Imagine somewhere in the Python script you’d call your own lambda - twice. You basically turned your lambda into a Fork Bomb that will spawn infinite lambdas

A lot of the times this comes down to a user error.

For example, very similar to your case, I knew someone that enabled Cloudtrail, and configured some things to have Cloudtrail logs dumped on S3. Guess what? Dumping things on S3 also creates a Cloudtrail that gets logged to S3 that Cloudtrail logs. Etc

Doing things like that and creating a loop can get you massive bills

Probably the best thing Ubisoft released since assassin’s creed black flag

They were streets ahead in their logo design…

We also got fully self driving cars in 2 years though, in 2016…

Snowe is sysadmin of programming.dev…

So source: Snowe

Many people believe that the ToS was added to make Mozilla legally able to train AIs on the collected data.

“Don’t attribute to malice what is easily explained by incompetence”

So yea Mozilla wrote some terms that where ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways, and ‘many people believed’ that they did this intentionally and had the worst intentions possible by their interpretation of the new ToS

Then Mozilla rewrote that ToS after seeing how people were interpreting the original ToS:
https://www.theverge.com/news/622080/mozilla-revising-firefox-terms-of-use-data

And yea, now ‘many people will believe’ that ‘Mozilla revised their decision to do this after the backslash’ - OR, it was never their intention and now phrased it better after the confusion

People just want to get their pitchforks out and start drama at any possible opportunity without evidence of wrongdoing… Mozilla added stupid stuff to the ToS, ok yea fair enough - but if they actually did “steal user data” - this would be very easily detectable with Wireshark or something

This feels like a personal attack

No one’s questioning why he’s sorting it twice?

It’s called embeddings in other models as well:
https://huggingface.co/blog/getting-started-with-embeddings
https://ollama.com/blog/embedding-models

Also some feedback, a bit more technical, since I was trying to see how it works, more of a suggestion I suppose

It looks like you’re looping through the documents and asking it for known tags, right? ({str(db.current_library.tags)}.)

I don’t know if I would do this through a chat completion and a chat response, there are special functions for keyword-like searching, like embeddings. It’s a lot faster, and also probably way cheaper, since you’re paying barely anything for embeddings compared to chat tokens

So the common way to do something like this in AI would be to use Vectors and embeddings: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/embeddings

So - you’d ask for an embedding (A vector) for all your tags first. Then you ask for embeddings of your document.

Then you can do a Nearest Neighbor Search for the tags, and see how closely they match

I haven’t used json(b) in a Spring app, so I can’t say much about that.

Json vs Jsonb depends on the use-case. Inserting json is faster than inserting Jsonb. Reading json (based on searching for specific json properties) Jsonb is faster, because Jsonb is parsed into a more optimized tree.

From my experience, I don’t really like doing selects based on json properties. If I know I’ll be selecting a certain property, I usually add an additional column next to the json with the data, and insert that property there (At least in c#/dotnet, with EF) The frameworks don’t have that much support for selecting within json (you can do it, it’s just a lot more natively supported to use proper columns)