Also, they give you a lead garment to protect the areas that aren’t being x-rayed. So the technicians are taking appropriate safety precautions for you as well as themselves.
Even without that precaution you get more radiation exposure from a long plane ride than from a single x-ray (less atmosphere above you = less shielding from cosmic radiation).
I think they’re trying to compare him to Robert Moses, who has a book called “The Power Broker” written about him. He was a prominent NYC unelected government official who held great sway over NYC and NY politics for decades.
I don’t think it’s a good comparison, as Mamdani was fairly elected, and didn’t use his soft power to get others elected. He just endorsed people with the politics people have wanted for the democratic party for decades.
When you accept that others rights can be taken away, you must also accept that your own rights can be taken away.
If you accept that groups can be excluded from society, you must also accept that your group may one day be excluded.
If you accept that might makes right, you must accept that one mightier than yourself will one day come along.
If you live by the sword, you will likely die by the sword.
Idk how many times this has to happen throughout history before people act learn from it.
Hormone free IUDs are something like 99.9995% effective.
They’re better than the pill and condoms at preventing pregnancy, lol.
Diabolical Lies podcast has a good episode on it.
You should have watched the promotional material more closely.
Work in nuclear power! Experience both!
As a radical polyamarous leftist, yes, send all your witchy women to me.
Compare my life to yours, and kill yourself.
You know what does research better than his yacht?
NOAA, funded by him (and every other billionaire) paying their fucking taxes.
Honestly probably the closest thing to Pikachu we have.
The second thing is actually pretty easy to answer. The same people from the first part of your answer have also been using their outsized power and influence to erode the power and influence of unions over time. Many actions taken by European unions would be considered illegal in America and met with violent state oppression. While Europe has maintained many of their labor rights from the turn of the 20th century, America’s labor rights have been rolled back to almost before the new deal. Most unions barely have the right to strike, and even when they can that power is exceptionally limited. Basically any effective labor action in the US would require people to accept that they are breaking the law, and will likely die, sustain life altering injury, or go to jail for it. Since most Americans that would benefit from strong unions are living in oppressive poverty to begin with they either see the risks of illegal labor action as too large, or have been propagandized against it.
People rarely distinguish between the sentiment of a demographic versus the sentiment of the individuals that make up that demographic. Hence, stereotypes.
“Americans” are not a monolith. There’s almost 400 million people in this country. Idk how each individual is doing, but most of the people I know are too busy trying to keep their heads financially above water to care. The actual American people have very little say over what happens in this country, and most are just as trapped in the horror as the rest of the world.
Does a country without public transit, universal healthcare, or any social safety nets sound like a country where the average person is in control to you?
“With any luck I’ll be hurling a Molotov at the CEOs primary residence”
Fun fact: Abusers are more likely to be family members than strangers.
Maybe that’s what they’re trying to say?
Here’s a cool book about it related to the meme (and it’s got an appropriate title).
Love the arc of Wikipedia btw.
Wikipedia in 2001: “Don’t use that site for school, it’s not a good primary source.”
Wikipedia in 2025: “Please, we’re begging you, just $3 can keep the last bastion of truth on the Internet from falling to misinformation.”
I guess I was a little to aggressive in my original comment. I meant to explain why minority only groups get less flack than majority only groups, not to suggest that men only groups shouldn’t exist.
Women only groups exist alongside the people who disapprove of them. I don’t see why men only groups can’t. As many have pointed out, however, men only groups DO exist. Someone linked to dull_mens_club as a Lemmy specific example, but more broadly, fraternities exist. Battered mens groups exist. I think some groups like nights of Columbus and the masons are or were men only. Men only schools and colleges exist, as do women only. Most veterans organizations are primarily men just by nature of who makes up the majority of most militaries.
You’re putting words in my mouth and confusing the difference between a demographic and an individual. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, women are oppressed. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, men are not. We’re talking about statistics here, not individual experience.
The fact that some men are oppressed does not imply men are equally or more oppressed than women.
The fact that women AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are oppressed and men AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are not does not imply all men are oppressors. It DOES imply that men opress women, but like… fucking duh? If men aren’t pressing women, then who is? It doesn’t mean all men are oppressors, but are you seriously going to sit her and act like the majority of domestic abusers, sexual harassers, and discriminators AREN’T men???
You’re interpreting a defense of women exclusive spaces as an attack on individual men. You should unpack that.
You really doubled down on that pun. There should be a law about that.