

i hope you’re not implying that it’s not a problem at all if the zionazis stayed in a land that doesn’t belong to them…
i hope you’re not implying that it’s not a problem at all if the zionazis stayed in a land that doesn’t belong to them…
you weren’t going to read anything anyway that so much as humanizes the Global South, let alone Muslim women.
Ah but you see, that line only works when it’s used by a lib. The same standard does not apply to them!
There’s absolutely no need to read books like “Do Muslim Women Need Saving?” for a better understanding on why Western media’s portrayal of Muslims is the way that it is, why do so when it’s much easier to regurgitate unfounded, fabricated, downright mythological what-is-practically Western projections on to populations that they deem “uncivilized”, all at the comfort of doing so from your own couch!
To the lurkers, if this was somehow not obvious, /s.
So “nuclear and military sites” are ones that typically inhabit women and children, very insightful reporting from MSMs.
Literally this. This should never be left unsaid, actually it should be underscored.
Yep, pretty much, I didn’t feel like putting it into words, so thanks for this. I’d add that arguably, when students “play the game”, they get the same flack, or worse, than job applicants who exaggerate or straight up lie in their resume the same way companies lie about free unlimited PTOs, job security, a clear career ladder, etc.
Using morality or honesty as an argument against students who cheat is an attack on students, a distraction from the fact that this shit doesn’t work the way it was advertised actually, which has been internalized and normalized in many societies, left uncontested, which is big bad.
in short: captalism lol.
slightly longer: captialism. lmao.
“I am often left with a choice between soliciting participation where students are merely the deadpan voice boxes of hallucinatory AI slop, or silence,” the Philadelphia teacher despaired. “Which am I supposed to choose?”
ChatGPT isn’t its own, unique problem. It’s a symptom of a totalizing cultural paradigm in which passive consumption and regurgitation of content becomes the status quo," Nathan Schmidt, a university lecturer and managing editor at Gamers With Glasses, told 404.
Seems to be easier to blame students for understandably responding to rote-practice, monotonous factory-work oriented slopfest curricula with slop, rather than actually addressing the core issue at hand.
Of course the situation might’ve been different. You wouldn’t have dumb needless animosity on sectarian lines as they do today. Understand that by saying dumb shit like “The fighting would’ve happened anyway!” serves two purposes: a) to minimize the depravity of the British, the British Raj and colonialism in general and b) assumes that clashes on the basis of sectarianism is an inevitable pathway. Btw, partitioning is a tried-and-tested, colonial “divide and conquer” tactic.
Point is, a lot more lives could’ve been spared had it not been for colonialism that plagued the area, this is indisputable.
fascist nest but the libs will try as hard as they can to make it seem like they’re not at all related to fascism all while equalizing socalist state leaders to their own neocolonial, liberal leaders in an attempt to absolve themselves of their own depravity.
The Post-Balkanization Effect
This is rather a colonial narrative. Do you think the fighting would’ve lasted as long if the British never colonized that area?
us state department told me so
I wish you and your German contemporaries could apply the same ass sentiment to the immigrants demonized in your country that have narrowly escaped the same ongoing wars/genocides backed by your state.
I do recognize international solidarity, it’s just that there’s more emphasis on solidarity with the workers of the Global South and it doesn’t include comfy libs, a majority of which are from the Global North. If that wasn’t hinted at in my original comment, then it is explicitly suggested here.
one unforgivably tried to appeal to the imperial core, (if somehow you’ve succumbed to the memory-holing, there’s analysis done here if you’re not allergic to reading), and the other? Well… Let’s take a look at what they’ve done by looking at the best of all time comments I’ve saved on this subject have to say:
So yes, the meme posted by OP is incredibly based.
(BTW many thanks to the users in these posts, your analyses + your due diligence to always provide a source for your claims are excellent. Hell, literally all it takes is a single undoctored image.)
It doesn’t really matter what you and I think. The wider public, as well as this community, recognizes that as a meme.
Here, have a look at many such examples of the same format:
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/fake-news-article-screenshots
They really perceive this as a game, and the libs are their cheerleaders. Here’s a hoping to a very nice [REDACTED] [CLASSIFIED] [REMOVED] to these shitty excuses of a [ERASED].
Fucking wild that Lemmy made it on mainstream news… of course it had to be some stormfrontian to get it to that stage…
There is no stringent definition of what a meme is or can be, despite what Merriam Webbster wants you to think. That there’s a meme, plain and simple.
*the house you stole