To my knowledge there exists exactly one reactor in china, and this is a test project. We know very little about it. I have seen many many talks in the last 10ish years but for such a “break trough idea” very very little actual physical proof for any of the big claims.
Edit: Wikipedia article of said reactor: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TMSR-LF1
Brussels will follow it without question or thought about negative effects on Europe, just because it’s given in Brussels that EU will follow US wherever it goes.
Like it happend with the last tariff’s? Not.
So basically the 4k remaster is not a remaster. I am disappointed.
Your entire argument was “Ah is useless and Wh gives consumers the information to determine battery life” So go ahead, determine the battery life.
Not quit sure where battery life is comming from, thats not my argument. To restate and also better phrase my argument:
Stored energy is the better measure for consumers for the quantification of the battery size in a consumer device compared to Ah stored charge.
Now i can cross compare devices based on that and do not have to worry about the Voltage of the battery of any other devices.
Please state the calculation that you would use to “determine how often you have to recharge” that is valid for Wh and not for Ah.
I never claimed that this is possible. I wrote “can recharge” not 'have to". I am referring to devices like a power bank which i can calculate with a simple:
powerbank has 100Wh and phone has 25Wh so 100/25=4 -> i can recharge my phone 4 times using that powerbank.
If you can cite a single source where the manufacturer gives a specification that would give battery life in Wh, and not in Ah, I will concede the entire argument and say that you were right the whole time in every comment make a note that you were right.
Basically every Laptop manufacturer.
Primary Battery
3-cell, 54 Wh, ExpressCharge™ Capable, ExpressCharge™ Boost Capable
I am ONLY speaking from a consumer position and for those Wh is more useful.
The consumer looks on device a and on device b and then determines how often he can recharge its device. With Ah you cannot do this unless you know the Voltage, with Wh you can make this decision without any further knowledge.
Yes this does not include battery life or conversion of efficiency. But a cunsumer measures nothing he looks at the lable.
It is fine if you don’t understand electronics, but then don’t spit out misinformation.
Btw. no need to insult me. I have never put out misinformation, I may have not stated enough that I am viewing this as a consumer.
The thing is, it does not matter how much charge the battery holds, it does matter how much energy it holds. Without knowing the Voltage the Ah is useless.
What a shitty clickbait title.
virtually all AMD chips dating back to 2006, or possibly even earlier.
Title could be shorter and more precise while still having the same deeming message.
I am not aware of a phone that has an outdoor temperature sensor. And weather forecasts are not exact enough for this kind of application (fast altitude change)
AI could also research past time and temperature data to add this information to historic photographs that already have time and GPS location embedded.
Not quite sure why you would use ai for it?! When you have the coordinates and the time.
Nuclear power does not solve the issue here. Nuclear reactors take hours or even days to ramp up or down. They are not quick enough to react to such occasions.
Just want to throw in this link. https://energy-charts.info/?l=en&c=DE
Very detailed info on Energy and power usage in Germany
World Nuclear Association’s mission is to facilitate the growth of the nuclear sector by connecting players across the value chain,
I would not ca that trustworthy. There not even close to independent.
You posted a 18 min Youtube video, sponsored or at least supported and sanctioned by a nuclear power plant operator.
At least point to the section of the video where the source of your claim is.
No it is not. If you calculate in the future money tax payers have to pay to keep the nuclear waste safe (for thousands of years) or the cost of a larger incident like Chernobyl or Fukushima which also has to be paid by the tax payers then the ‘cheap nuklear power’ is not so cheap as it looks like…
No they can’t, that is basically illegal in every jurisdiction. Will not even click on that click bate title.
You can not find that Option via the default Settings menu, you have to search for it or use the outdated control panel.
Also Windows Home edition does not have this option.
Edit: you can find it actually under Windows security.
Still, it never pops up during installation.
Yep but at this point it is obvious to the user that this is not the way it is supposed to be. When you want to shoot yourself in the foot…
And a big point is, it is a technology that we have to develop anyway, since big targets like governments, military or big financial or economic companies would want to defend against anyway.