Ok?, they weren’t and you know that, which means your response was meant to detract from the original argument and to prevent any further constructive communication.
Ok?, they weren’t and you know that, which means your response was meant to detract from the original argument and to prevent any further constructive communication.
All you’re complaining about here is that my biases are different from yours.
I’m not complaining about anything, I’m calling out your hypocrisy.
I’m pretty open about my biases dude,
You sure weren’t open about it in that comment I responded to.
I’ve been watching you for years dude, you don’t have room to talk about biases.
“Nobody is stopping you from explaining why the original posted story is wrong.”
Breaking news: There is a teapot orbiting Mercury.
Use your sources to prove it wrong.
It’s obvious they’re not talking about that type of liberal.
Why would a Russian care?
Donetsk and Luhansk Republics
1991 isn’t real.
17. Change the Subject ~ Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
Sidetrack Opponents with Name-Calling and Ridicule ~ This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Good thing I’m not a liberal.
What random sentence generator did you use?
“It’s just an exercise”
“It’s just a special military operation”
Your distractions will not work against me. Prove there isn’t a teapot orbiting Mercury. I want you to demonstrate for everyone here why that doesn’t make sense.