Mail Carrier, Autistic, Parent, Pagan, and a very cool dog.

Nonbinary with no preferred pronouns. Engaged to a bisexual sponge.

  • 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • Skoobie@lemmy.filmtoMemes@lemmy.mlWell let's not do anything hasty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah, now I will admit to there having been a potential nuance. I certainly would want a trial before an execution, for instance. But I also think it would be wrong to assume these scientists were completely morally innocent. Maybe I could be persuaded from my earlier opinion of “You always shoot a Nazi” but there needs to be something to show. A diary entry saying “I’m not sure about this Hitler fella.” Something.


  • Skoobie@lemmy.filmtoMemes@lemmy.mlWell let's not do anything hasty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be frank, it would be hard to siphon out truth from fiction at this point from personal accounts. That said, of course I distinguish between a forced Nazi accomplice and a sympathizer. I am not suggesting that they should be treated the same. I am suggesting that the U.S. was so zealous in its efforts to defeat the Russians that it wasn’t making distinctions.



  • Skoobie@lemmy.filmtoMemes@lemmy.mlWell let's not do anything hasty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Promising a deal that includes citizenship, a house, a salary, and an administrative position to a Nazi scientist in exchange for their work and knowledge such that one’s country can gain ground in a cold war is absolutely fine. It’s absolutely totally fine.

    Following through with the deal after getting the goods from the Nazi is not. Shoot the Nazi. You always shoot the Nazi.


  • I mean, intent matters a little at least, right? Like, I prefer to use the term progressive when describing myself and I found this meme to be a firm chuckle and not problematic. It’s saying that the logic used by things like CRT is thematically identical to logic used in biblical texts, which many on the right would actually oppose politically and ideologically.

    So like, if the intent was to reframe CRT in a biblical light so as to show ethical inconsistency on the part of Republicans, and it works on a logical and a humourous level, what exactly is the problem?


  • Skoobie@lemmy.filmtoMemes@lemmy.mlMisunderstood
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a hilarious joke but imagine if it were truth. How would such context affect the morality of the NK government and its actions against its own citizens. I’d like to thank OP because this is the kind of thing that gives my mind a break for days as a distraction to contemplate.