• 0 Posts
  • 100 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 17th, 2024

help-circle

  • Skua@kbin.earthtomemes@lemmy.worldGood luck, bro
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago
    • Launch a ball of dough against a designated target at the correct speed for it to flatten out on impact
    • Borrow modern artillery targeting systems so that a ball of toppings impacts the same spot a moment afterwards
    • Fire a HESH round to cook it



  • I really dislike that German system, but for those that want an explanation:

    Traditional European music theory evolved towards using sets of seven notes out of twelve in an octave. We eventually labelled those notes A through to G. Originally A was the lowest note available in common notation and we built our instruments accordingly (see the lowest and highest note on most pianos even today), but we then take a particular liking to the scale that starts on C using this system.

    Even though this worked really well most of the time, in each seven note scale there was one standard combination that was pretty harsh (the diminished chord, such as the B chord in C major). To get around this, people just kind of accepted that B could be in two different places - the usual position if that sounded better, the flattened one (one twelfth of the octave lower) if that worked better. The system of sharps and flats wasn’t standard yet - nor was the modern staff system at all, for that matter - and it was only really this note that it mattered for most of the time, so the solution was to write the letter B in two different ways depending on which one you meant. There was a round B and a square B.

    And then Germany gets really good at making printing presses. This is very useful for spreading copies of musical notation, but it does present a problem: your press probably doesn’t have two ways to write the letter B. So what do you do instead? Use another letter for one of them. H is the eighth letter, and it even looks kinda like the square B anyway, so that becomes the standard practice.

    One fun quirk of this is that it permitted Johann Sebastian Bach to write his last name in musical form, which he went on to do in a whole bunch of his compositions




  • On a per capita basis it still emits about half as much as the United States.

    This is still high, and China’s per capita emissions have only gone up over time so far. It currently emits about as much per person as the EU does. This is too much, and both China and Europe need to reduce their emissions by a lot. Every year that they don’t is more damage done.

    Also, China’s emissions figures are misleading since it has an enormous surplus in trade of manufactured goods.

    Consumption-based emissions paints a slightly better picture of China, but only slightly. It is still 90% of the EU’s per capita emissions on this metric.

    And just generally, what on Earth is that last full paragraph? “If China almost doubles the number of cars it sells, and it subsidises all of them by this number that appears to have been plucked from nowhere, and then it also subsidises batteries and solar panels by the same amount, well that makes a really big number that America isn’t doing nearly as much as!”

    The WP article is not some anti-China screed; it is openly discussing China’s very real opportunity to lead the way for the world here. It brings up a lot of the progress that China has made and its enormous success in manufacturing the things needed for cleaner power. That it also brings up some of the challenges China faces in doing so hardly seems “bizarre” to me. Right now China is doing no better than Europe, and the fact that they’re both better than America will help exactly none of us.


  • Skua@kbin.earthtomemes@lemmy.worldHell Yeah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It’s worth considering that that still means a (slim) majority of millennials don’t own a home. You’re also roughly in the middle of the generation, and the hone ownership is quite heavily weighted towards the older end




  • Skua@kbin.earthtomemes@lemmy.worldHell Yeah
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    30 days ago

    Right, so the “where” is the USA.

    If we take this definition of the generations and table 12 from here, we can compare the values 16 years apart to see generations at equivalent ages. 2023 is the most recent data on that table, so millennials would be 27 to 42. We can’t match that perfectly with the 5 year bins on the table, so I’ll just average every bin that that generation covers a majority of. With that, we get:

    2023 2007 1991
    Gen Z 23.6% x x
    Millennials 47.9% 24.8% x
    Gen X 72.0% 53.4% 15.3%
    Boomers 78.5% 76.9% 49.1%

    We can compare generations at the same age by looking along the topleft-bottomright diagonal. This shows gen Z having a lower ownership rate than Millennials did 16 years ago. Millennials were doing better than gen X 16 years before that, but have now fallen behind both gen X and the boomers.

    Sure enough, the entirety of the discussion of homeownership in the article you linked is:

    American Zoomers’ home-ownership rates are higher than millennials’ at the same age (even if they are lower than previous generations’).

    Not sure what data they’re using since that doesn’t tally with the above, but that’s still second-worst, and the actual worst is the generation the post is actually talking about.



  • I have to use Teams for a remote course I’m doing and holy shit no program I have ever used is worse for notifications than Teams. Even turning off everything doesn’t prevent it from flashing on the taskbar, so you then have to go disable that for everything as well. I know someone sent a message in chat, Teams, I am in the fucking call where they sent it