Or: We’re using math to summarise what the experiments have said so far. And then using that to extrapolate what might happen in the next experiment.
Or: We’re using math to summarise what the experiments have said so far. And then using that to extrapolate what might happen in the next experiment.
I would argue that physics is based more on experiments than math.
Solid matter physics would be a more straightforward name - it’s just the physics of matter that isn’t liquid or gas, which usually means crystals.
The UN is more a place to talk with your enemies than with your friends, and getting the chance to sit at a table with people you disagree with rather than fighting each other is great.
If there are any Palestinians left to disagree with.
What is this black magic?? How are these symbols a valid domain name???
Original from Perry Bible Fellowship: https://pbfcomics.com/comics/one-more-day/
Weird that the text was re-written, I wonder if the comic was somehow translated and translated back to English?
Technically ready and available now, just not ready to compete with classical computers.
Which, sadly, is a step above what fusion has achieved so far.
Not a commie, but didn’t the Norwegian people nationalize the oil production, leasing it out to companies while keeping a huge share of the profit for the welfare of common Norwegians?
My understanding is that, in a sense, that is exactly what seizing the means of production is about.
Plenty of physics sub-fields are still led by experiments, such as condensed matter physics. I don’t know if your statement applies to anything other than particle physics?