TheTechnician27

Koopa*

I give him 11 minutes.

This list is outdated. David Joyner replaced Karen Lynch at CVS Health this October.

And it still ends up being worse than its FOSS competitor…

So actually, about that…

Posting articles based on the contents of their headlines rather than the quality of their content or the reliability of the source seems irresponsible.

Oh, for sure. Most of these ones in the image seem like they should be taken out by an employee of whatever restaurant or gas station they’re at, placed into a dumpster, and then taken away. I forgot to even address the fact that sanitation workers have fuck-all to do with the pictured garbage; good call.

Why are you posting from Newsweek if you agree that it’s a rag? Your post directly before this one was Reuters. Your actions don’t align with what you’re saying here.

“I couldn’t find a single vacant public toilet, so I did what any sensible person would do and took a shit in the middle of the sidewalk.” —OP, analogously

Don’t garbage men have surprisingly handsome pay? Or is that just an urban legend I’ve fallen for?

Better (Reuters) source here

Newsweek has been a rag for over a decade now.

This except a Brazilian spider that gives painful erections.

It’s less about which ISPs have IPv6 and moreso how much work one has to do to get it working on their home network. Thankfully I think we’re in an era now where any new router you buy will support IPv6 and most major ISPs support it. However, in order to get IPv6 working on my home network, I need to 1) know that IPv6 is a thing (massive filter), 2) know that I don’t have it, 3) be motivated to have it, 4) call my ISP and ask them for a prefix, and 5) go into the router settings and enable it.

For cellular Internet, this is (short of using settings or Termux to see my IP) completely, 100% transparent to the end user, as it should be. It should be the default, not a process 99.9% of people wouldn’t even know exists, let alone initiate.

It’s unreal how bad the state of home Internet IPv6 is in the US. Meanwhile, Malaysia, Vietnam, and China are all pushing formally for full, 100% IPv6 adoption by decade’s end.

Before “Seward’s Folly” gets brought up, I invite you to watch this Premodernist video.

True. See WP:NOT and WP:CON for some idea of how this whole thing works.

CosmicRaySort.

• “We are open.”
• “We open are.”
• “Are we open?”
• “Are open we?”
• “Open, we are.”
• “Open are we.”

So 2/3 of these permutations actually make sense.

Am I allowed to steal the chatroom analogy?

You fail to realize that this is the most meaningful action that the UN General Assembly can take against the US on this matter. The UNGA can be very effective in facilitating international cooperation and settling minor disputes but really has no tools in its arsenal to meaningfully effect action to stop something like this.

I can hopefully demonstrate this by asking you what lever(s) the UN can pull to actually directly address this. Before you say “send aid!”, they are. And before you point to something like its past military intervention in Korea, be fully aware that that’s not at all applicable here: the US has a permanent seat on the Security Council and therefore absolute veto power; the only reason the UN was able to intervene in Korea was because the USSR didn’t use their Security Council veto; and the US is not capable of being directly matched militarily by any nation on Earth, let alone in their home waters. And before you say “sanctions”, well I’ll give you one guess what organ of the UN controls sanctions.