5·
1 year agoThis kind of reactor could be installed on cargo ships
- 0 Posts
- 52 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 4th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
How dare Isreal… honor the terms of their agreement?
Nah, it’s fat. That’s why polar animals have blubber
12·1 year agoI like how they’re wrapped in paper
There’s two of us!
I think I meant to reply to the OP, sorry. Your comment is great, and I like it much more.
That’s a nice thought, but what comes across is “Your current problems aren’t important, now support my fringe political view”
Is “Try to make the world a better place” really so high a bar?
So instead do nothing and circlejerk how miserable you are?
And at no point did I advocate for doing something trivial. I said pick one thing that’s important to you and put your effort into that. Do you think poor people deserve homes? Volunteer your time on weekends to build them through organizations like Habitat for Humanity. Do you think that’s just a bandaid over a societal wound? Find a group of like-minded people and try to fix that deeper wound.
My recommendation is to pick one problem and focus on it. Don’t feel like you need to fix everything in the world, just make a small part of the world better. Volunteer at a soup kitchen, clean up litter, canvas for a ballot measure you care about. Doing nothing while agonizing over how much is to be done helps nobody.
See, that’s what I mean. You treat The Revolution as an inevitability, then twist yourself into knots to justify why it hasn’t happened yet.
Me:
In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion.
You:
I can’t fathom the arrogance of people who say “Marx just didn’t think of x, y or z”
Please, enlighten me how I said that
Why shouldn’t I? I stand by my original point and you’ve done nothing to rebut it
Oh ok, what I really meant was:
In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion.
In my opinion, Marx wrote his conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion.
Nothing in that implies what you’re accusing me of
The economy of Vietnam is a developing mixed socialist-oriented market economy
That doesn’t sound very communist to me, and I’ve heard plenty of times that a mixed economy isn’t a socialist one at all.
Or is that only when it’s a European country?
Read the article, the OP only quoted the part that talked about the downsides
It’s about developing small, safe reactors