This doesn’t really make sense in the Lemmy model inherited from reddit. A post belongs to a specific community, you can’t put one post in multiple communities. You can crosspost, and from there you can jump to the original and see its comments, but the comments on a crosspost belong to the second community.

Maybe a crosspost should not have a second comments section, and opening it should always send you to the original post, but I don’t think that’s desirable. For example, if I’m banned from the first community, should I be forbidden from commenting on the post when it’s crossposted to my second community?

I give it less than a week.

You can delete posts.

Yeah I looked into those a little while back to see if there was an air filter product that didn’t constantly need fiber filter replacement. Turns out that ionizing air creates ionized air (ozone), which is bad to breathe.

You could read the article

I didn’t even see that. So they’re also at elevated risk of complications and birth defects. Also this:

Anna loves the feeling of being pregnant.

This is messed up and incredibly selfish.

This just gets worse the more you read. They already have ELEVEN KIDS.

Seems like it. No mention of the fuel efficiency either, which leads me to assume it’s significantly worse than existing flights.

I’m not aware of any full-scale invasion, only seizing the land in and beyond the buffer zone. And western media is reporting on that, e.g.: https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/10/middleeast/israel-syria-assad-strikes-intl/index.html

I skimmed this article too, and it only talks about the buffer zone.

A barrel is a barrel, and I think it highly unlikely that a mass-produced product leaving a unique fingerprint on something that’s been smushed into a completely different shape can be used as forensic evidence. Unless you know of it being scientifically proven, it is the domain of TV CSI.

I don’t think he really cared about getting caught all that much, just enough to do it and get away from the scene.

Because if you already know the trolley problem, you already know the whole content of the post. If you don’t, now you do.

I had UHC but I’m generally healthy so I either had no claims or none denied, but I’ll still contribute to his legal defense.

That’s a real big if, and history indicates it would be unlikely.

I think they are intentionally targeting old devices so that they remain useful.

Vietnam Parliament Approves $67 Billion High-Speed Rail Project

Where do you see the word “to”?

Ah yes, those famously traitorous Moroccan waiters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lillehammer_affair

Interesting. I tried Chinese and it also throws an error. Looks like it was a manual thing in only some languages.

I’m guessing it’s in the output handler, not the UI exactly. I don’t think you can edit models like that, and the fact that it knows about it at all means they didn’t whitewash the training data set. But my knowledge is limited. In their place, I would probably have included “don’t talk about tiananmen square” in the initialization rules. But failing that, I would have added something in the output processor to check for forbidden knowledge and throw an exception.

Still, it’s strange that it got the words out before dying.

Let’s give it a whirl!

welp