crimson_iris

But that creates a distinction the people in charge can use to deny what’s happening. Now and in the future. “It’s a small group of bad apples, most ICE agents aren’t like that.” Etc. It’s all of them. The whole agency has to go. For that purpose, I think continuing to just call them ICE is useful.

What’s the benefit of not referring to ICE as ICE? What they’re doing should reflect on the organization as a whole. They should not get to say “well they weren’t our agents, I don’t know what you’re talking about.”

What have you done,

Now it’s 80087,

You monster.

Excuse me, horse leads troops.

Sisulla siitä selviää.

Brick, where’d you get a grenade?

Hope you and Mulligan have many more orbits around the sun.