I mean the parent comment mentioned tests…

You would also port the tests, right?

What’s a good modern text to approach the genre?

Makes sense, thanks!

So what are you saying? Even with pretty good vision it makes a massive difference?

There’s embedded rust for a few platforms. Using it on ESPs is fun

There is a difference however. The techno feudalists are no longer about the means of production. Instead they increasingly show rent-seeking behaviour. Businesses looking to own “market places” and becoming brokers of other people’s services is a techni feudalist trend. Take Amazon for example. They sell top spots in their search directly to business customers. An app store monopoly is more akin to land ownership than classic factory capitalism.

I love “unimplemented!”

I’m guessing wasm

Np necessarily. Usually errors are detected at runtime and reported as such. So you will see where your program failed, but it usually crashes nonetjeless. Keep in mind that crashes are usually better than continuing some undefined behavior.

Programming term. Variables in programming languages can hold different types of data, such as whole numbers, floating point numbers or strings of characters (“text”). Untyped languages figure out on the fly what can and cannot be done to the content of a variable, while typed languages strictly keep track of the type of content (not the value) to catch bugs and improve performance, for example.

No, it’s about the legitimization of law, the legitimization of use of power, checks and balances and unconditional human rights.

Usually codified by lawy not prosecuted as “immoral behaviour” as such. Although if you look at recent anti-abortion legislation in the US it is intentionally vague. That shifts some burden of interpretation to the executive branch and is a sign of authoritarianism I’d say.

It absolutely does imo, it legitimises itself through an appeal to an underlying moral framework.

Yes, but very indirectly. We don’t have a “moral police”, but one that enforces laws which are, as you say, legitimized by the people as a sovereign.

So you don’t see police stopping people on “moral grounds” in some vague interpretation.

the state maintains that this is a moral and legitimate use of force: that it has the authority to do this.

I don’t necessarily agree with “moral”. In western democracies laws and use of force doesn’t legitimize itself by a call to morality usually. Just using some kind of authority, doesn’t make a government authoritarian by any common definition of the word.

Hot take. What’s the eli5 behind the idea?

Well, there are general takeaways, the particular topics are really just examples.

What are birth stones?

Dont opals lose their shine or something over time due to being hydrophilic?