Yeah, I can see that. I sometimes think people don’t have a sufficient imagination when it comes to what the cost could be, or they don’t think some of the horrible stuff could be possible. So I was giving some push back.

I think we need to think about these things because I think we are rapidly heading to a darker place.

I don’t think we can rely on there being a large amount of people like you to take all the hits. I think we need to find a way to share the work amongst everyone to get to a better place. So I think having the expectation that everyone works against their most deeply held interests like family is one that will make us weaker as a whole.

So would it be better to say that most people have a price?

I’m not arguing with you yet, because the only thing you have done is ask me a troll question. All I know is that you don’t like what I have said, but you are too much of a coward to state your own position.

I feel great right now. But I am concerned I may have to make a choice between providing for my family or making excellent software for lockheed martin at some time in the future. My price is my family’s well being and that isn’t really a secret.

Done, what’s next?

Hmm, I haven’t found any historical examples of specific threats against families. I am a bit surprised, if they are willing to kill workers, why not also threaten their families?

Also my statement was corpos in general. So it was a systemic argument.

So you would be ok with your family starving because you won’t work for military corporation? If true I admire your dedication, but I couldn’t do go through with it.

I think you’re trolling me because you don’t have a good counter argument and you are mad.

Do you need specific threats or will just the threat of death due exposure and or starving death because you can’t pay for food or shelter?

It’s not about what they could give you, it’s about what they could take away.

https://lemm.ee/comment/17037733

Oh, how would you do that? I would also like to be not targeted.

It’s not about what they could give you, it’s about what they could take away.

https://lemm.ee/comment/17037733

Looking at how badly I am getting down voted, I am afraid to say anything too controversial. I have probably been reported several times for being correct.

https://lemm.ee/comment/17037733

Do you think corpos wouldn’t unalive people to increase their profits?

What if the corpos threaten to unalive your family?

Everybody has their price.

Hmm sarcastic or not sarcastic… This is a hard one. I’m going to guess sarcastic.

Yes! This is a form of organization. Which I think is a requirement for getting a more progressive government.

I agree with that. I never disagreed with the meme.

It has never been my position that voting for the lesser evil will solve all of our problems or bring about a progressive government.

I have only ever argued that voting for the lesser evil will give the people who are trying to organize (us) a better environment for doing so. Voting for the lesser evil helps with the organization. It’s weird to me that people are against voting for the lesser evil. I don’t get it, I hope someone can explain it to me.

Can you please stop assuming what positions I have?