Adding some extra CPU compute or ASICs for solving puzzles will not slow down a bandwidth-constrained bot. Bandwidth is still the bottleneck and cost factor. With the current state of AI investments, I bet they will go to great lengths to scrape every little bit of the internet at whatever internet bandwidth they have available.
How does this work? What prevents AI bots to just solve the proof-of-work and enter the site anyways? It doesn’t take much compute to solve it if I can do it on my phone in a second.
Thanks I’ll look into it.
I already have a full backup of the entire English Wikipedia using Kiwix. It’s surprisingly small. Around 100GB.
How do I go about this? I’ve got 30TB available, 24/7 uptime. It’s not much but it might help.
I’m not saying that AI can’t be used to detect cancer, but it can’t be used to diagnose any medical condition.
The doctor needs to do the diagnosis. The AI detects it. AI is definitely used like that. And not just somewhere. AI is being used widely in the health sector. So it’s not just some bullshit. It’s actually useful. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
are we really so dumb that we’d take away the power of doctors
You seem to be a bit confused. Nobody said anything about replacing doctors. And insurancr companies weren’t even mentioned.
that’s one big pile of shit. don’t know what else I expected from someone who blindly supports a tool with religious fervor.
How do you even “support” that? What are you saying? Neural networks have neen around for longer than you’ve been alive for. It’s being used fucking everywhere. And not just yesterday but for many years now.
Remove AI (neural networks) from existence and you wouldn’t have the following:
You’re just completely delusional and mad because you read something about LLMs on the internet. You’re the one who’s religiously attacking something so ambiguous and ubiquitous while not having any technical understanding about the underlying technology.
Explain to me how transformers, RNNs, or CNNs work and we can keep this discussion up.
It can detect cancer. The need for double checking or verification is just that: double checking and verification. But the AI detected it. You know what “detect” means right?
It can also find chemical compounds for medicine. It needs to be tested like every other medicine found by humans. But it was found by the AI nontheless.
AI can make discoveries in space that no human or discriminative algorithm would ever be able to do. Do you know how big space is? And how much data is available for inference? Exponential discriminative algorithms (or even worse humans) would take billions of years finding things that generative algorithms can find in hours. It’s an incredibly valuable tool. More valuable than the telescopes themselves.
Your comment shows that you have no technical understanding of the technology. You project LLMs on AI in general and don’t realize that AI has been around being productive for the past 50 years. AI is the next step of evolution. Like fire, agriculture or electricity. It will make life so much faster, more efficient and more productive. It has already enabled us to accomplish and discover amazing things and it will only accelerate.
So why did the commenter generalize to AI then?
AI is amazing. It can detect cancer. Find new chemical composites for undiscovered medicine. It can solve unsolved problems in astronomy. It optimizes logistics and productions in ways that discriminative algorithms would never be able to.
Ok sure. Leave it as is. I can say it’s not interesting to me and I’d much rather see posts more deeply linked to technology and not politics here. I’m entitled to my own opinion. Let’s just leave it at that.
I’m unsure how this post intrigues my interests in technology. I don’t think this is related at all.
It’s like posting a 9/11 post in a Boeing community so all the Boeing nerds can learn which plane model was used. I feel like there are more relevant communities for it.
Technology? I feel like this is about a genocide and not about technology.
Are we going to repost this every day now? I’ve seen like ten sources here covering this.
This would have never happened in the first place if some imbeciles hadn’t done a massacre on civilians and kidnapped the rest. I don’t know what their plan was…
Like Hitler won his war right?
Dumbass didn’t encrypt the chats and didn’t do moderation according to local laws. If Facebook did the same as his company did, Mark Zuckerberg would share his fate.
And we called it what?
And 90% of it is R&D.
How can generative AI even have programming errors like that? Everything it says it the result of the data it was trained on. So apparently it was trained on a lot of fascist conspiracy theories.