NGL, this looks kinda terrible
NGL, this looks kinda terrible
And the only thing even worse than SCRUM is literally every other option
Remote Desktop
What this shows is how terrible raw JS is, when all of this crap is required to fix all of the edge cases and make things actually work the way it’s supposed to.
If you’re using assembly, then you’ve already given up on the easy ways.
Vivaldi will never have it
It’s the API that ALLOWED the misuse in the first place, so the developers are the ones to hold accountable.
No need, GUIs are better for most tasks.
So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
So what? Malicious extensions can do anything. Don’t run untrusted code on any computer you care about, ever. This is true for any IDE extension, any NPM package, any mod pack, etc.
If only mutable value semantics are allowed, then how can you represent an object graph with circular references (let’s say HTML DOM, for example) while still allowing modifying the objects?
Seems like this would be very difficult to work with in practice.
This is why .NET code compiles to platform-independent binaries that get JIT translated to machine code and optimized for the target CPU. Developers don’t need to do anything (the applications don’t even need to be re-compiled), they will just get conditionally optimized when appropriate.
This has nothing to do with that. They already have all the data they could ever need to train the model.
It literally can do that, yes. But the plug-in version is separate and requires a subscription.
The top part is useless anyway, it’s funnier if you just crop off the header… that’s just one of those things people slap on so they can feel like they’ve contributed something, but really it’s just noise.
Alternatively, just use this one instead:
If you’re branching logic due to the existence or non-existence of a field rather than the value of a field (or treating undefined different from null), I’m going to say you’re the one doing something wrong, not the Java dev.
These two things SHOULD be treated the same by anybody in most cases, with the possible exception of rejecting the later due to schema mismatch (i.e. when a “name” field should never be defined, regardless of the value).