Removed by mod

“international law” haha

I mean, many US states/cities already do forfeitures, so applying this to foreign individuals and entities is just… consistent??

Which is fine as they will also lose access to western capital markets

I don’t mind upgrading but windows won’t allow me… MacOS looks not bad. Or linux

I thought you are our cattle!

The BOJ is counting on low interest to force a devaluation of peoples savings to drive consumption and, given the massive amount of savings, it will take time to burn through that

Which is something I also observed. And even some trucks are electrical.

Not only that… A significant portion of cars in china are already electrical, at least in very large cities.

Unfortunately, that is the same notion shared with other neighboring muslim countries, as well the rest of other countries

A compile-time checker. Amazing

It also depends on the context

Building high quality rail networks requires legal framework to facilitate that given that initial costs are staggering. The US framework simply leaves everything to private initiative and given the multitude of local land regulation and lack of laws to support strategic mobilization at this scale, it is guaranteed the USA will never have a country-wide high speed rail network. There are just too many interests to satisfy in a very diverse legal landscape across cities, counties, and states.

Laws of war… Pffffttttt

Class 6 and above are pretty zippy

This is why the post and the thread are so funny (assuming people are being intentionally funny)

160 is fast?

Sardines

Yeah, nothing special here

I use vi