No, Patrick, not everyone that disagrees with you is a bad faith actor.
That’s part of the problem with modern liberals, you’ve propagandized yourselves into believing you’re the only intelligent creatures and anything or anyone else that doesn’t agree must be subhuman idiots. It’s why you people constantly fail to secure even the easiest of support.
Right, when you choose to be black, people like you give it consequences. Your logic is flawless.
I’m not the person you were arguing with. Based on your argument, your words, there are no consequences for discriminating against black people, and shouldn’t be.
There are, if you include the law, but since we’re ignoring it to make your argument work, there’s no consequences.
When arguing something, trying arguing the opposite to yourself before posting.
Based on your argument, free speech means no consequences. Stop being a debate bro if you’re this bad at it.
You were wrong, and he thoroughly showed you how you were wrong.
By your logic being black has consequences.
No, no, no… Just because all ranking officials of the party were specifically on the US terror list for associations with ISIS and ISIS-k, and just because the leader literally was the leader of ISIS-k; that doesn’t mean they’re just an offshoot of ISIS that incidentally does the West’s bidding.
The star of David was adopted as a Zionist symbol, not a Jewish symbol. Before ~1850 it would be ridiculous to conflate the two, and until the 1940s it was still incredibly controversial to link it to Judaism. It was ironically the Nazis that popularized the idea a hexagram should be the Jewish symbol.