This strikes me as nonsensical. If one person stops eating meat then the meat industry will create less waste. Maybe not exactly 1 person less, but unless they literally trash all of the meat that person would have consumed, it must be less.
- 0 Posts
- 22 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 16th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
This is pretty much how The Handmaiden’s Tale book goes. “Terrorists” nuke DC and some Christian fundamentalists take over.
4·2 months agoDon’t you mean 5/7?
I don’t see much negatively. But I use lemmynsfw.
Jerry: “Aren’t you going to see what the message is?”
George: “Nah.”
Kramer: “Why not? It could be important!”
Jerry: “It’s not like you to ignore a message…”
George: “Okay, okay! I’ll tell you. I was sitting at home.”
Jerry: “Doing what?”
George: “Nothing.”
Kramer: “Oh yeah! I love doing nothing! I love it!”
Jerry: “Nothing? Sounds boring.”
George: “Spoken like an amateur. I have it down to an art.”
Kramer: “We should compare notes!”
Jerry: “Anyway, then what happened?”
George: “I get a text from this girl I had lunch with.”
Jerry: “Lunch? Like a date? A” lunch date?"
George: “I don’t know, I don’t know! How can you know? Who suggests lunch when someone asks them out? I don’t know, but she did!”
Kramer: “Yikes!”
Jerry: “Okay, so you get this text message.”
George: “That’s right.”
Jerry: “From the lunch maybe date maybe not woman.”
George: “That’s right.”
Jerry: “What does it say?”
George: “What are you doing?”
Jerry: “I’m asking what the message said!”
George: “I know! The message said, ‘What are you doing?’”
Jerry: “Ooooo. Okay. And?”
George: “So I sent her a reply, that said ‘nothing’.”
Kramer: “Classic mistake.”
George: “Well I wish I had known! How am I supposed to know?!”
Jerry: “I don’t get it. What’s the mistake?”
George: “After I told her that I wasn’t doing anything, she called me!”
Jerry: “On the phone? What for?”
George: “To talk!”
Jerry: “About what?”
George: “Nothing! I wanted to do nothing, not talk about nothing!”
Kramer: “You got yourself a phone talker.”
George: “A phone talker!”
Jerry: “Seems like it. So what are you going to do?”
George: “What can I do? I’m going to have to tell her talking on the phone causes me migraines. It’s the only way…”
Kramer and George leave. Jerry sees a message from Elaine that says, “What are you doing?” He puts the phone down.
Will you please explain this?
I feel like I understand each sentence but not why you put them together.
Except that a recent study shows that a plastic bag charge in the UK significantly changed behaviors:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00266/full
So the suggestion that people are unchangeable is plausible, but turns out to not be true.
Boris literally just made up stories about the horrors of the EU when he was a journalist in Brussels:
https://www.ft.com/content/ad141e8a-976d-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36
He definitely helped set the stage for Brexit.
Yeah but your Linux partition is a freak and will do whatever you want. You can even ask it to dress up like Windows or macOS is you want for some reason… it doesn’t care!
10·5 months agoI’m curious why you think Python is unsuitable. Both of my kids picked up Python pretty easily.
Here me out please.
Throughout most of the time humans existed we lived a migratory existence. It is only with the adoption of agriculture that staying in one place sense made sense.
Now here we are, with like 2% of our population involved with agriculture and still living that way.
We should all migrate like birds and stay in cooler climes during summer and warmer climes in the winter.
Obviously this is a huge change, but we can do it!
In Holland we have 99% humidity all winter with temperatures right around freezing and no matter how many layers you add the cold wet air seeps in and chills you to the bone.
I think that they mean you still have to eat and sleep and try to have joy in your life.
I suppose it is possible to have two PR that have changes that depend on each other. In general this just requires refactoring… typically making a third PR removing the circular dependency.
It sounds like your policy is to keep PR around a long time, maybe? Generally we try to have ours merged within a few days, before bitrot sets in.
You can make a PR against your feature branch and have that reviewed. Then the final PR against your man branch is indeed huge, but all the changes have already been reviewed, so it’s just LGTM and merge that bad boy!
How is this different from creating a feature branch and making your PR against them until everything is done, then merging that into the main branch?
5·10 months agoEmacs was the first bloated IDE!
It can be done. The website provider can generate a request that it forwards to you. You then pass on this request to the age verifier, who can answer “yes person is over 16” without knowing why you want to know, or who generated the request.
The requester wouldn’t know your age, just that you were old enough.
There are a few problems.
One is that the website could embed some identifier in the signature of their request. But any information there can be easily send by the web site provider to the age verifier directly if they wanted so this is not a big problem.
Another problem is that the age verifier could look at times when requests were submitted and create a sort of “fingerprint” based on when requests arrived for different sites. This could be partially helped by having browsers request age verification randomly in the background any time you use a browser.