- 0 Posts
- 56 Comments
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•(cant find the aita community) am i a bad person for saying "women" instead of "people who can get pregnant"?
26·12 days agoI really love this reply and especially how it promotes genuine decency rather than coerced decency. I know I’m not exactly adding to the discussion, but I really wanted to recognize how warm this reply felt to me with something more than a mere upvote.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's the last song you found that was so good you had to let it play on repeat a couple times?
2·3 months agoThomas Dolby, “I love you, goodbye”.
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's a service you’ve been using forever that hasn’t enshitified?
6·3 months ago- Sync
- Vyte
- FollowUpThen
- Todoist
- Insight Timer
- DNSimple
- Netlify
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•I'm not sure, but it might be something about UUIDs
18·3 months agoNew Dutch programming language just dropped.
Agile as she is spoke. 🤷
Options have value.
Options expire.
🤷
You don’t even need the hyphen!
Mind = blown.
I assumed Python was unpopular in England, because programmers couldn’t spell
__init__(). 🤷
If “close enough” works, then it’s nice to have the skill. Having the skill requires occasionally using it.
Where accuracy is important, since we almost always have a calculator with us now, that’s a no-brainer.
Maybe more to the point, though, understanding how percentages work is wise. It’s one of the few arithmetic topics that we encounter regularly in life.
In this case, 23% of 53 and 53% of 23 each have their own little trick, depending whether you’d rather overestimate a little with 1/4 of 52 or underestimate a little with half of 24. I find it handy to be able to think that way, especially for example when trying to get out of a taxi and paying cash.
Pretty close to 1/4 of 52, so like 13-ish, but maybe closer to 12.
(13 + 0.25 - 0.53 - 0.53, really. If I had to, I might be able to keep that in my head.)
I have settled into this pattern:
- Name expands as I understand better the structural role of a thing. Duplication in names begins to become easier to spot.
- Removing duplication in names means introducing helpful structures, resulting in shortening names again, particularly as the intent/purpose of thing becomes clearer.
Long names stay unnecessarily long when we don’t notice the patterns that suggest the missing structures.
The more examples of this kind of thing, the better!
(And my preferred name for that is
rolesByEmployee. In general, “values by key”.)
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•If you've recovered from depression, what did it feel like?
5·5 months agoLow feels more numb than dark. More like being on pause than everything is terrible. More “I’ll try again later” and less “this is never going to get better”.
I don’t remember the transition. I can’t tell you how long it took. I was only on antidepressant medication for about 18 months.
Peace.
I see that they’ve gone back to the name “The Daily WTF”. For some time, they changed to “Worse than failure” in order to avoid not even the word “fuck”. 🤷
Welcome! I guess this is your Ten Thousand moment for a mediocre joke for old programmers. 💪👍
What if
roleisFILE_NOT_FOUND?!
jbrains@sh.itjust.worksto
Programming@programming.dev•How to deal with a not so good related team that always asks for help?
3·6 months agoGood news, relatively speaking.
I’ve been where you are. Most important: don’t let yourself start to take responsibility for managerial decisions. If they want you to stand in the corner on your head and cluck like a chicken, it’s their money. 🤷 Don’t let that change how you see yourself as a programmer.
And roll your eyes in private.


Given the stereotypical difficulty of “product folks” and programmers agreeing on and building shared understanding of what to build, this joke seems clear and straightforward. It works because of course, the customer and the programmer failed to agree on something simple.