Math and science all have a philosophical core, it’s just that most of the time you don’t need to question it, so it’s easy to forget about it. Which is fine
Math and science all have a philosophical core, it’s just that most of the time you don’t need to question it, so it’s easy to forget about it. Which is fine
deleted by creator
Yeah I used to follow the vegan group cos I like tips on vege eating but I had to quit cos the meat eater hatred was just too much
My problem with Rust is that I find refactoring really painful.
I really like Python. The only thing I don’t want to do with Python is support a large code base. Lack of strict typing makes refactoring awful
Okay. I live in New Zealand. How do we force the US to not fund Israel?
I don’t think it’s insincere at all. Most nations would like the US to not support Genocide but none of them have the power to force the US to do anything
I don’t think it’s naive. It’s the view of almost every nation in the world
The US also should not do that
He’s not wrong
People have eaten meat for thousands of years. That’s been a matter of survival, not entertainment. But my comment was about people taking joy in killing, which is what the meme is about, not taking joy in eating,. I appreciate your zeal but I’d prefer you to not ascribe to me arguments I didn’t make
Oh I fully agree that not eating meat is the better alternative. I just thing the meme was stupid. There’s plenty of valid reasons to promote eating less meat without making up strawmen
I have. I note several responses from people in the thread who have.
What’s your problem with that? I’m not into it myself but I can’t see how it’s any different from eating meat in the first place
We need to eat. We don’t need tol take joy in aninal deaths. These are different things and the meme is dumb.
Don’t apologise. Totally my fault - I was being a dick. I’ve been on the other side of this kind of interaction with someone doubling down after being called out on being a jerk. I should do better. Thanks for your response
Sometimes you make a comment about something that seems interesting and then realise you’ve wandered into a enclypoedia convention and have bitten off more than you have the head space to deal with. I probably should have said that instead of what I did say. My apologies
Thank for your instruction, Internet rando
What’s this? Actually considering the arguments presented and not dismissing them as antisemitic out of hand? Are western judicial systems allowed to do this?