That makes sense now. Thanks for extra context.

Whoever committed this change thinks updating the text on the UI for this system will automagically fix issue.

It’s like editing the HTML on your bank’s website to show you have $1B in the bank 😂

Issue here committer forgot to update UI to expose the feature person was working on

EVs don’t combust spontaneously. If the battery of an EV is compromised or battery pack is pierced and lithium is exposed to air. Then that violent reaction (lithium oxidizing the air) will produce the fire you see.

I think this is from a training exercise though. Suspiciously empty lot. Some branding on vehicle might indicate test site. The idea here is that by covering the vehicle with the fire resistant blanket, the fire will consume all of the oxygen and eventually put it self out.

Lockdowns provided short term relief for reducing GHG but later bounced back to pre-COVID levels [1]

[1] https://climate.nasa.gov/news/3129/emission-reductions-from-pandemic-had-unexpected-effects-on-atmosphere/

Long term we need to improve the efficiency at the source (power generation) and get rid of O&G dependency. In addition, transform cities to become less car dependent (the microplastics from ICE/EV based cars tire wear is not good) Also Western diets have to change (reduced meat consumption).

I do like the idea of keeping WFH as an option though. The mandatory RTO sentiment of C-level executives is annoying to say the least and data is not backing up their reasoning. Keep an office for the people that prefer it and reduce the office footprint. Gather data over time and let teams and team leaders decide.

long term survival of the species

Bro that went out the window when people were fighting over 🧻 and causing local supply issues at grocery stores.