No, the same vulnerability does not exist here.

There are different vulnerabilities here, but this one isn’t there.

Good thing it doesn’t work here.

But it’s a known way to make money on the other site.

Your DE may be the one not relaying the sigterm, or it may be losing the PID because of the double launching.

Does the LSB have something to call on termination? Or you may want to call an executable there instead of a script.

It’s not broken. You just have to get a cron that supports it. Debian has at least one that does, but it’s not the default one.

Though, not every cron supports that.

Also, if you are packaging software, you have to do it the right way. But if not, it’s often easier to go and install an init script.

Israel is not a religion. Judaism doesn’t have an army.

There doesn’t seem to be space there for any kind of kit either.

Oh, the uBO people fixed that already! That’s great!

Thank you, devs.

To be fair, making if physically cursed instead of only conceptually is an improvement.

They are valid unicode points that your font doesn’t know about.

… or at least they represent that, but I think there’s a character that looks like one too.

He is a sponge. He has either no skeleton, or that weird soft one where no piece links to each other.

intermediary language between regex and actual programming

It’s called Haskell.

Validate your backups, do not let them validate you!

Yes, there are random systems using every kind of smart or brain-dead option out there.

But the 2038 problem impacts the previous standard, and the current one will take ages to fail. (No, it’s not 33000, unless you are using some variant of the standard that counts nanoseconds instead of seconds. Those usually have more bits nowadays, but some odd older systems do it on the same 64 bits from the standard.)

There are both kinds of full stack developers: the frontend dev that doesn’t understand the backend enough to know they suck at it, and the backend dev that doesn’t understand the frontend enough to know they suck at it.

A has been consistently improving it since before the change, so it’s only possible that they are managing to the metric if they had earlier access to it.

B may be doing that, but the graph doesn’t actually measure how many bugs you closed. Those ones seem to have decided to manage by the metric, removing the variance but targeting a high, comfortable level.

Agreed on C, they did a large “hey, we will be measured by that now” one time effort and then forgot about the metric.

The change didn’t improve anybody’s performance.

Well, that’s the goal, isn’t it?

Hum… Don’t sniff that powder, it’s sodium hydroxide and will burn through your nose if you do that…

Just to say, but I have a few circuit board etching recipes that require a diversity of white powder things measured on precision scales…

Oh, it’s inside a pool! Yes, the nearly horizontal surfaces are the border tile, the transition tile and the pool bottom tile.

It does make sense. But I’m not sure why one would want 3 different tiles in a pool (the vertical, transition, and bottom).