Pretty much

How many run ins with the law have you had?

Not defending ICEs actions, but sometimes leaving the bullet in is best. You’ll do more damage extracting it than it will do staying there. No idea if that’s the case here, but there are times when leaving it in is appropriate.

I mean… given who the president is, if it works out would make him a fantastic lawyer. But fantastic lawyers are not necessarily good people.

Unlike New York, Minnesota can prosecute for the same act as the feds. This wouldn’t implicate state level double jeopardy protections.

https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/no-touching.gif

I neck shot my deer last year with a 30.06. No huge exit wound. Obliterated the spine. We usually hang them from the head but had to hang this one by the hind legs.

Kirk, who had no active warrants…

Any law or regulation needs to be put to a think tank with the specific task of gaming it or finding the loopholes. Then shut that shit down. This type of shoot is predictable and annoying.

I was wondering how a 32 year old was a vp.

What is missing from this story is how the agent ended up in the vehicle. Pretty sure that’s not an effective way of getting someone out of a vehicle.

Apparently you missed that I did as well…

Yet here you are trying to argue a cut and dry case the other way. That’s for a jury if it goes to trial.

And her version she claims she was trying to understand what they were saying. It’s perfectly reasonable if someone is obviously yelling something towards you and you can’t understand it that you get closer. Closing the distance to talk to someone isn’t being the initial aggressor. If this goes to trial, that will be something for a jury to decide. We don’t really get to do that here.

Not in the legal sense those words are used. In a “duty to retreat” state you must attempt to retreat if one is available and reasonable before you can attempt to defend yourself. That means you can’t back pedal and shoot someone.

Should try to get your hands on each and every cop use of force and how those were handled. Show them video of a cop shooting an unarmed black man with their hands raised and ask them to point out where the cop was in more danger than in this case.

Bear in mind he was really only “innocent” because he was 17. Generally you must legally be allowed to possess a gun in order to claim self defense. No matter how cut and dry a self defense claim is, if you are illegally carrying, it’s usually moot. Had he been 16, his possession would have been criminalized under one law, which would have killed his self defense claim. Had he been 18, there was a different law that would have made it illegal for him to carry. But Wisconsin fucked that up by leaving 17 for some un-fucking-explicable reason not defined.

He’s a damn Saint! I was the one cheating for him. Lost my ass but he’s such a good guy it was worth it.

And also that mens rea doesn’t apply to all crimes that could be charged. Like “first degree murder” requires intent to kill while “manslaughter” usually requires intent to harm but not necessarily kill. “Reckless endangerment” likely doesn’t require that intent at all, just neglect to prevent a harm.

Those might not be the exact names or criteria of crimes depending on state, but that’s the general idea.

Hitler rarely gets credit where deserved. He did what no one else could do and many tried. He finally killed Hitler.