There’s no such thing as rapidly aging, there’s exactly one year per year, we don’t age any faster nor slower. Declining birth rate, sure, but no such thing as rapidly aging.

Candy Crush

I would go back to 1955 (yes, kinda ironic to think of it), with more modern medical instruments, anesthesia, sterilization, etc, and try to save my Baby Blue uncle who I was named after. He was born with his intestines on the outside and only lived one day ☹️😭

Yeah I’m no medical expert nor surgeon, but holy shit he might have had a better chance with more modern medical equipment and knowledge, I would have surely tried to do my most cautious best…

Mr. Norris told Satan to fuck off…

Heads up OP, while your pet may be naturally prone to epilepsy, seizures or other neurological disorders, it could actually be something in their diet that you might not be aware isn’t safe for your pet.

I learned quite a bit about this after the one and only time our dog had a seizure and went doing some research. The day before, a friend of ours casually gave our dog some rather tasty pork, cooked along with onions, garlic and other mystery spices he refused to reveal.

Apparently that was a BIG mistake! Onions and garlic are on the list of dangerous foods for dogs, and around half the list of dangerous foods list side effects such as seizures…

https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/nutrition/human-foods-dogs-can-and-cant-eat/

After studying this list and being more careful what he is and isn’t allowed to eat, he hasn’t had any seizures since then.

Of course, if you’re asking about another sort of pet such as a cat or whatever, make sure to do similar research on what is and isn’t safe for your pet in particular to eat.

Unavailable Due to Mississippi HB 1126

Fuck this state…

I’ll try Tor

Edit: That was a very interesting read, Tor works for anyone blocked from viewing the article, or VPN, or both…

No no, I meant the cat is sitting on the inbox, if you tilt it to left, you might empty the outbox in the trash…

I’m more concerned why there isn’t an Outbox button, but I digress…

I don’t have an exact answer, but have you tried turning the screen sideways?

8Letter™

Yesterday

• The chicken is not green
• The horse is not eating chickens
• Why does Mart have to die?

I do think that most dialects of Basic automatically zero out variables when they’re defined, but my code concept here makes no such assumptions, I assume the worst that all variables start off as random garbage.

I chose Mobile Basic because it’s easy to understand, the code concept doesn’t require any super complicated language, and I can easily piddle around with stuff like this when out and about on road trips and such.

If you like the coding idea, feel free to use it and even adapt it to other languages.

One thing I don’t exactly like about this particular version of Basic is that it’s kinda picky on what all I can and can’t do between integer vs double data types, it doesn’t allow bit shift operations using doubles, which does make sense, but some other Basic dialects do tend to allow that by simply rounding to an integer before performing bit shifts. I guess it just depends on what your calculating priorities are, decimals or integers…

Also, how is AI gonna interpret such code without running it first?

Its kinda easy for human eyes to see what I did, but how is AI gonna comprehend what letter equals what number?

That’s absolutely awesome!

I’m gonna start referring to this as ‘smelling AI slop’

You got the sense to sniff it out, even without programming experience. And that’s a damn good sense to have these days 👍

This comment has been confirmed and validated by an actual human being 👍

And this is why I come up with stupid concepts like this, coding without numbers, just to fuck up artificial intelligence…

https://lemmy.world/post/43158470

Sorry I said it was Friday, it was actually Sunday 🤦‍♂️

That’s actually the even more proper way to handle it, thanks for the update 👍

I didn’t write the article, neither did OP.

If the article is false, well so be it, but at least the supposedly false article was archived.

Sometimes, even if an article proves to be false, readers in the future might still be curious what all the article said or claimed.

🤷

OP posted a working archive link in the comments…

https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

You should edit your original post to use the archive link, as the main link now leads to a 404 error…