Simply beautiful

deleted by creator

It’s saying that it doesn’t match the job-seekers profile, ie seeker does not meet requirement

Except I think it’s interesting this was not generalizable. The Spanish were looking for people, just different people at first. Cortez for example landed and immediately “employed” hundreds of native people to come up with some wealth to pay off the exploration debt. The friars were specifically there to convert people to Catholicism.

The British puritans were looking to build their personal Utopia, but the Spanish and others, it seems to me, were looking for a populated colony from the start.

True, though, bushtits are ferocious.

Thank you so much, I’ll check it out…

Wow, ok you said that and I was like I’ve totally seen that price on the regular, which is why I stick to gala, but I went looking and can’t find anything over $2.49, so, way to go, you fixed inflation! What else don’t you believe?

All they need is a third developer to divide up the project for them and design the interfaces

That’s what the sentencing court called it I guess. She was arrested on terrorism charges for her clothing and for promoting women’s rights on her social media, along with two female relatives, so the quotes are to show that it was not material or militant support, but expression of her views.

Ok, this is my new favorite comment ever

I like the DocuSign model. Just focus on securing your one account (email) and then make all the others use it as single factor.

I had the same thought. Like, I think Aurora is one of the most expensive ways to do this in AWS. But, since this particular set of data is so well-defined, and unlikely to change, roll your own is maybe not crazy. The transactions per second and size don’t seem that huge to me, so as things grow I imagine they can revisit this.

No, listen to me, armed mass kidnapping on this level warrants military intervention. But, even a thousand murders does not warrant genocide. When they’ve got you arguing whether or not someone deserves to be victims of a war crime, you are lost.

Maybe “many” is wrong. My question is whether it matters how many and whether engaging in these debates over minor facts is just playing into their hands.

I think you’re right, they are just chipping off one group.

I just don’t think the question matters. How many hostages killed would make Israel’s one state solution and the violence required to establish it either right or even viable?

I guess I’m wondering if this particular ploy works and on who? And maybe the talk back shouldn’t be “you’re lying” but more like “who cares?”

This whole rape story is bizarre to me. Like whether it’s real or not really doesn’t affect my view of the situation? Am I weird?

Hamas kidnapped people and has executed many of them them --that’s a criminal act of terrorism, supported by foreign governments, requiring military response. However, there’s no way to make Hamas’ actions so bad that indiscriminate genocide of Palestinians becomes appropriate or excusable. I’m offended that these stories are given such importance like they are supposed to change my mind about that.

Feels a little like appealing to some patriarchal emotional bs, like they’re hoping we all fly into a blind rage over it. Maybe Israel is hoping we will pass their guilt off as a “crime of passion”? Feels old-fashioned.

If nakedcapitalism.com censors themselves for money that’s their own problem.

They’re removing ads from the site based on content standards they have agreed to with the advertisers. They’re not censoring anything and have only notified you of the changes you would need to make if you want to keep their business. You are not owed revenue from Google or anyone else.

Is it a problem that so much of the Internet, including your site, “depends” on corporate advertising? Yes. Is that censorship? No. You are free to find your own sponsors.